Stroller schrieb:
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the theory,
that one of the other drives have hidden errors. The chances for this
grow with the size
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Mittwoch 17 Dezember 2008, Stroller wrote:
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there
is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the
theory,
that one of the
Iain Buchanan schrieb:
On 17/12/08 19:57, KH wrote:
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:18:24 +0100, KH wrote:
Which is why you still need offsite backups.
Best you have them with your grandparents in another town. Maybe there
is a flood ;-)
Mine are a thousand miles away, so
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:44, KH wrote:
Stroller schrieb:
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies
there is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the
theory,
that one of the other drives have hidden errors.
Stroller schrieb:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:44, KH wrote:
Stroller schrieb:
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies
there is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the
theory,
that one of the other drives
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:24:27 -0800, Grant wrote:
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:18:24 +0100, KH wrote:
Which is why you still need offsite backups.
Best you have them with your grandparents in another town. Maybe there
is a flood ;-)
Mine are a thousand miles away, so unless its another Biblical flood...
--
Neil Bothwick
Earlier, I didn't
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1 does? They even protect in
the event of theft
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:24:27 -0800, Grant wrote:
They even protect in
the event of theft or fire which RAID1 doesn't.
Which is why you still need offsite backups.
Best you have them with your grandparents in another town. Maybe there
is a flood ;-)
kh
Grant wrote:
Do you guys think RAID1 is unnecessary with an SLC SSD drive?
No need for RAID1, brand new technology always works right in the first
generation. There are never problems. :-D
It would be interesting to run RAID1 between an SSD and SATA drive. I
wonder what sort of issues the
Do you guys think RAID1 is unnecessary with an SLC SSD drive?
No need for RAID1, brand new technology always works right in the first
generation. There are never problems. :-D
It would be interesting to run RAID1 between an SSD and SATA drive. I wonder
what sort of issues the disparity in
On Mittwoch 17 Dezember 2008, Grant wrote:
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1 does?
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:18:24 +0100, KH wrote:
Which is why you still need offsite backups.
Best you have them with your grandparents in another town. Maybe there
is a flood ;-)
Mine are a thousand miles away, so unless its another Biblical flood...
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:51 -0800, Grant wrote:
Do you guys think RAID1 is unnecessary with an SLC SSD drive?
No need for RAID1, brand new technology always works right in the first
generation. There are never problems. :-D
It would be interesting to run RAID1 between an SSD and SATA
Grant schrieb:
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1 does? They even protect in
the
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:30 -0800, kashani wrote:
Grant wrote:
Do you guys think RAID1 is unnecessary with an SLC SSD drive?
No need for RAID1, brand new technology always works right in the first
generation. There are never problems. :-D
It would be interesting to run RAID1 between an
On 17 Dec 2008, at 02:24, Grant wrote:
... Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why.
Everyone loves RAID1 because it backs up your data.
Note the use of quotation marks.
You stated that data throughput was a bottleneck for your system, so
RAID1 may not give
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there
is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the
theory,
that one of the other drives have hidden errors. The chances for this
grow with the size of the hd.
On Mittwoch 17 Dezember 2008, Stroller wrote:
On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote:
...
Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there
is
a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the
theory,
that one of the other drives have hidden errors. The
On Mittwoch 17 Dezember 2008, Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:30 -0800, kashani wrote:
Grant wrote:
Do you guys think RAID1 is unnecessary with an SLC SSD drive?
No need for RAID1, brand new technology always works right in the first
generation. There are never problems.
On 17/12/08 19:57, KH wrote:
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:18:24 +0100, KH wrote:
Which is why you still need offsite backups.
Best you have them with your grandparents in another town. Maybe there
is a flood ;-)
Mine are a thousand miles away, so unless its another
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1 does? They even protect in
the event of theft or
Grant wrote:
I'm about to buy a couple Samsung Spinpoint F1 hard drives and I was
planning on setting them up in a RAID0 array. Everyone seems to love
RAID1 though, and I'm a little confused as to why. Don't daily
backups secure 99% of the data that RAID1 does? They even protect in
the event
Get the best of both worlds with raid 5.
Personally, I do raid 0 and I agree with you on raid redundancy not being very
useful. Backup ftw. I cycle out my hard drives every year or two and make the
old ones be backups, I've only ever had the backups die.
- Ian
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:45 PM, smallnow small...@gmail.com wrote:
Get the best of both worlds with raid 5.
Personally, I do raid 0 and I agree with you on raid redundancy not being
very useful. Backup ftw. I cycle out my hard drives every year or two and
make the old ones be backups, I've
25 matches
Mail list logo
