Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
That was the past, -Os generally
Kenneth Prugh wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that flag in the past?
That was the
Mike Edenfield wrote:
More importantly, -O2 seems to be the typical optimization
setting, and almost all free software packages are built and
tested and generally supported, for whatever that means in an
open-source world, under -O2. If you report a bug in a package
and you use -Os, the first
Hi,
Have you actually measured the gain? Emerge some thing with Os, qsize the
package, emerge it with O2, qsize again? I went back to O2 from Os when it
became apparent that the resulting binaries were actually _larger_. On every
single package I tried.
Zsitvai János
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Although I agree with your reasoning above, you are contradicting
yourself in the following two statements:
At least, it's no more broken under -Os than under -O2.
[...] benefits of using -Os over -O2 are minimal
compared against the possible problems it might
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Montag, 23. Juli 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then Os. That is a big nono.
Why's that?
Alexander Skwar
because several gcc have compiled crap with that
8 matches
Mail list logo