On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:50:02PM +0100, pk wrote
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
I believe that 180 or 181 is the first version that requires /usr on /
(or an initramfs or whatever). And that's why it's currently masked.
--
Hello!
2012/3/11 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com:
The next step was to remove /usr from /etc/fstab to prevent /usr from
being mounted twice (the boot process does not like it).
Mmmh. Could you try to use LABEL= in /etc/fstab (not /etc/fstab), and
see if that way it gets mounted, and
On 2012-03-11 03:36, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
This news item is to inform you that once you upgrade to a version of
udev =181, if you have /usr on a separate partition, you must boot your
system with an initramfs which pre-mounts /usr.
Ok, I thank both you and Neil for this info. In
Hi!
I had some struggle with a separate /usr on top of LVM and the dracut
thing. I noticed that udev was complaining at boot that it could not
find some scripts.
The usmount dracut module did not work for me because it could not
find /usr. So what I did was to include the fstab-sys smodule in
2012/3/11 Jorge Martínez López jorg...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I had some struggle with a separate /usr on top of LVM and the dracut
thing. I noticed that udev was complaining at boot that it could not
find some scripts.
The usmount dracut module did not work for me because it could not
find /usr.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for stuff. I basically want LVM for
everything but root itself and /boot of
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for stuff. I basically want LVM for
everything but root
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I'm going to try to beat some sense into this a while longer then I'm
going to bed, right after rm -rfv /mnt/gentoo/* is started. ;-)
What's the point in using -v if you're not there to watch it? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Documentation: (n.) a
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I decided to do a fresh install on the larger drive. I sort of like to
brush up every once in a while. I got to the point where I want to do a
emerge -e system then copy my world file over and finish it up. It
appears that the stage3 tarball
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:45:53 -0600, Dale wrote:
I decided to do a fresh install on the larger drive. I sort of like to
brush up every once in a while. I got to the point where I want to do a
emerge -e system then copy my world file over and finish it up. It
appears
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:30:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
I've seen that if you switch to ~arch and make wholesale USE flag
changes. I think I avoided most of it by switching arch, doing emerge
-e system or world and then changing USE flags.
I even tried USE=-* emerge -e system and it just griped.
On 2012-03-10 03:48, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy!
this? I'm thinking about redoing my partition layout. I'm wanting to
keep / (root) on a normal ext4 file system. I want to put /usr, /var,
As long as you don't use the udev version that requires access to /usr
at boot time (or mdev) then you
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 03:45 -0600, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:03:44 -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, that is one of the things I want to change. I have several
reasons for wanting to change this mess. One is a file system change
and the other is to use LVM for
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:30:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
I've seen that if you switch to ~arch and make wholesale USE flag
changes. I think I avoided most of it by switching arch, doing emerge
-e system or world and then changing USE flags.
I even tried USE=-* emerge -e system
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:58:18 +0100, pk wrote:
Btw, does anyone know which version of udev requires access to /usr? I'm
running latest stable here 171-r5 and I have separate partitions for
/home /opt /usr /usr/local /tmp /var, all on LVM and /boot on a separate
partition outside of LVM, and it
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [120309 21:55]:
Howdy,
[..]
[0.787822] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
It found your initramfs...
[0.867787] Freeing initrd memory: 5084k freed
The followng look like they're from your Dracut initramfs
[0.880111] audit: initializing
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
Best regards
Peter K
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
That's one case; I would
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [120309 21:55]:
Howdy,
[..]
[0.787822] Trying to unpack rootfs image as initramfs...
It found your initramfs...
[0.867787] Freeing initrd memory: 5084k freed
The followng look like they're from your Dracut initramfs
[
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:50:02 +0100, pk wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
testing, not masked. Although it turns out that the latest in ~amd64 is
the same
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems.
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
Just posted to -devel,
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On Mar 10, 2012 10:38 AM, Neil Bothwick lt;n...@digimed.co.ukgt; wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:58:18 +0100, pk wrote:
gt; Btw, does anyone know which version of udev requires access to /usr? I'm
gt; running latest stable here 171-r5 and I have separate partitions
Howdy,
Well, this is what I am thinking about jumping into. Ya'll ready for
this? I'm thinking about redoing my partition layout. I'm wanting to
keep / (root) on a normal ext4 file system. I want to put /usr, /var,
/home, and such on LVM. I been using that dracut thingy to build the
init
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
Well, this is what I am thinking about jumping into. Ya'll ready for
this? I'm thinking about redoing my partition layout. I'm wanting to
keep / (root) on a normal ext4 file system. I want to put /usr, /var,
/home,
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I keep my /usr partition in /, but seeing the modules from dracut, the
magic happens at:
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh
Basically, it seems that if /usr is specified in /etc/fstab, then
dracut will mount it. It says nothing about LVM, but
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I keep my /usr partition in /, but seeing the modules from dracut, the
magic happens at:
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh
Basically, it seems that if /usr is specified in
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I keep my /usr partition in /, but seeing the modules from dracut, the
magic happens at:
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98usrmount/mount-usr.sh
Basically, it seems that if
27 matches
Mail list logo
