Hi James,
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I I re-emerge 'timezone-data' and just wait until spring to see if there
is a problem?
Here is the procedure I used last spring (you'll need to set the
TIMEZONE according to your location:
(1) Sync. (perhaps not required if portage is fairly up to
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 17:29 -0500, Eric Martin wrote:
Why copy? when stuff gets updated you'll have to copy again. I'd
suggest making a symlink. Also, I see the timestamps and sizes are the
same, but are the md5's the same? If not, these aren't the same file.
/random longshot suggestion
James wrote:
Shawn Haggett podge at podgeweb.com writes:
In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
CLOCK=local
TIMEZONE=America/New_York
CLOCK_SYSTOHC=yes
Is the /etc/localtime file correct? i.e.:
$ cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/New_York
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any other ideas?
Maybe I need to 'reemerge' something?
timezone-data?
Cheers,
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Albert Hopkins marduk at letterboxes.org writes:
/etc/init.d/clock is run pretty early in the init process; before all
filesystems in /etc/fstab are mounted. If /usr/share/zoneinfo is on a
filesystem that is not mounted when /etc/init.d/clock is run then it
will fail and ugly things will
Vaeth vaeth at mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de writes:
Only if you run CLOCK=UTC the shift is guaranteed to work in any case
(of course, unless another program like windows interferes).
Well 'local' did not work, so I'm going to set it to UTC and see what happens
in the spring.
James
--
I suggest you install ntpd, which will sync time with ntp server. And
I dont think set CLOCK=UTC is a good idea. If you are using WINXP,
it will change your clock to local always.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Shawn Haggett podge at podgeweb.com writes:
In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
CLOCK=local
TIMEZONE=America/New_York
CLOCK_SYSTOHC=yes
Is the /etc/localtime file correct? i.e.:
$ cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/New_York /etc/localtime
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
On 2007-03-02, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else having trouble with the format (^M's) in Ennis'
email?
Yea, his posting looks pretty much like the dog's breakfast
inside slrn.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Oh, I get it!! The
On 2007-03-02, Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 10:12 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
se having trouble with the format (^M's) in Ennis' email?
nope. maybe it's due to top-posting snicker. no just kidding, but
isn't that indicative of a NL/CR-LF difference between
10 matches
Mail list logo
