On 2008-03-03, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using iptables,
On 2008-03-03, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Grant Edwards wrote:
| AFAICT, iptables is the user-space portion of netfilter.
That's correct, yes.
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
Reliable inter-continental Mail Relay Service - Ask me!
Independent Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG
On 2008-03-03, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
However, it's using iptables, which I thought was deprecated,
but there
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-03-03, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I found shorewall and firestarter, but neither looked very
useful to me:
1) They're both designed for configuring firewalls, and I'm
not building a firewall machine.
2) Neither seemed to have any way to specify port-based routing.
So it looks like plain iptables is
On 2008-03-03, Dan Cowsill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found shorewall and firestarter, but neither looked very
useful to me:
1) [...] I'm not building a firewall machine.
I hate to plug a non-gentoo distro, but if you're building
yourself a linux firewall and you want to do so without
On 2008-03-03, kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not aware of any iptables front end that will also manager
policy based routing which is Cisco-ese and maybe general
Network-ese for what you're trying to do. However I would use
shorewall (or whatever you prefer) to do most of the work and
On 2008-03-03, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-03-03, kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not aware of any iptables front end that will also manager
policy based routing which is Cisco-ese and maybe general
Network-ese for what you're trying to do. However I would use
Grant Edwards wrote:
I don't understand why I have to do NAT. Can you explain why?
(Or point me to docs that explain why?)
router01.your.network.com
eth0 - 10.11.12.1
eth1 - 24.1.2.231 - Comcast
eth2 - 64.1.2.132 - Speakeasy
Naturally RFC 1918 space is useless
On 2008-03-03, kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
I don't understand why I have to do NAT. Can you explain why?
(Or point me to docs that explain why?)
router01.your.network.com
eth0 - 10.11.12.1
eth1 - 24.1.2.231 - Comcast
eth2 - 64.1.2.132 -
11 matches
Mail list logo
