[gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings

2006-01-01 Thread Peter
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:53:18 -0500, Peter wrote: For right now, I have reiser handling /mnt/src, and I'll leave this alone for a while. Don't know if performance will improve. It _might_ since the act of syncing will force a read through the entire portage tree which might make metadata faster

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings

2006-01-01 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter wrote: | On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:53:18 -0500, Peter wrote: | For right now, I have reiser handling /mnt/src, and I'll leave this | alone for a while. Don't know if performance will improve. It _might_ | since the act of syncing will force a read

[gentoo-user] Re: Portage 50-51% and emerge metadata timings

2005-12-28 Thread Peter
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:16:39 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote: Portage deficency? You mean the fact that python scans some thousands of files in the file based database, writing as it goes? and that the real cache is centrally generated, right? Yup, from thousands of files in the file based