[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gentuxx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something like an nfs for windows I guess. I've seen that very thing
but it was an ancient non-developed app.
I haven't messed with it at all, but supposedly the Microsoft Services
for UNIX (SFU) is supposed to have NFS
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
frankly samba is a mature and stable package. It should work. Perhaps
the OP's efforts are better directed at figuring out what is going wrong with
samba.
Yes, that was the conclusion I came to (I'm the OP) as well and have
now gotten it working. It was a
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:08:48 -0500
reader wrote:
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
frankly samba is a mature and stable package. It should work. Perhaps
the OP's efforts are better directed at figuring out what is going wrong
with samba.
Yes, that was the conclusion I came to (I'm
Michael Crute [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
anything other than samba the works reliably.
HTTP
FTP
DAV
Samba
SSH/SCP
(probably others too)
Take your pick. Though as
As far as I know, Windows XP and newer versions of Windows prefer CIFS over SMB. You can't even access a Win2k3 share with samba without CIFS or disabling a server signing in the Win2k3 server.
On 8/11/06, Quag7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quag7 wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 18:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Michael Crute" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there
6 matches
Mail list logo
