On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:08:20 +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
> OK, I checked some of the files in /var/log/portage and it is getting
> stranger! I have both types of log files with the new name format. 2
> examples are attached to this mail (gzipped). Both (genkernel and
> linux-headers) were emerg
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:47:57 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> There's a little confusion here. Portage now saves all package logfiles
> in the latter format. The files you are seeing on $PORT_LOGDIR are
> probably portage logs, not elog output. Have you checked the contents of
>
Richard Fish schrieb:
> I'm on portage 2.1.2_pre1-r1, and logs are still appearing in
> /v/l/portage/elog/ for me. So I'm really thinking this behavior will
> only show up with particular make.conf settings. Can either of you
> post your make.conf please?
Here it is:
cat /etc/make.conf
# These
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:47:36 +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
>
>> on one of my machines elog saves messages in /var/log/portage instead of
>> /var/log/portage/elog ? The funny thing is, that it worked first.
>
> Does var/log/portage/elog exist? Is it writable by portage?
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
