[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-19 Thread Alexander Skwar
Devon Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You both seem to be arguing about what constitutes stable. Yep. For emerge, all that matters is the tree. Nothing else is important - actually, nothing else exists, as overlays also become part of the tree, sort of. > And there are 2 > different definitions:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Neil Bothwick > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:53:27 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: > > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > > > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? > > > > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:53:27 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? > > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different > (ie: newer) version offered. Go

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 22:53 -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: > Quoth the Alexander Skwar > > · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>digg2ogg > > > > > > should be dir2ogg > > > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2og

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Alexander Skwar > · maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>digg2ogg > > > > should be dir2ogg > > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be diffe

[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello group, > > I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge > digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of > date. There is no digg2ogg in the tree. > I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get > the latest versions of software

[gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
· maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>digg2ogg > > should be dir2ogg 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? Alexander Skwar -- Don't SANFORIZE me!! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list