Hans-Werner Hilse hilse at web.de writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:19:15 + (UTC)
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Well, after much ado, it seems quite easy (trivial) to hide
an ethernet interface, while being able to collect reems
of local ethernet traffic based
Scott Tiret stiret at oneredshoe.net writes:
I've never used this one, but the idea of a Honeypot is simple and
sounds like what you are looking for.
emerge -s honey
Ok, I'll try this one, but,
I sure hope my wife does not
get jealous
thanks,
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
William Kenworthy billk at iinet.net.au writes:
wirecutters/stanley knife as appropriate - cut the tx wires in the cable
to the card. In one case where the box had to absolutely silent (hacker
proof, undetectable monitoring - think it was the honeypot project where
I saw this one?), the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James wrote:
gentuxx gentuxx at gmail.com writes:
I've set up Solaris systems with multiple NICs, 1 as a
command-and-control interface, and 1 as a sniffing interface. The
sniffing interface was configured without an IP.
Did you partially configure
James wrote:
William Kenworthy billk at iinet.net.au writes:
wirecutters/stanley knife as appropriate - cut the tx wires in the cable
to the card. In one case where the box had to absolutely silent (hacker
proof, undetectable monitoring - think it was the honeypot project where
I saw this
5 matches
Mail list logo
