[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Harry Putnam wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: uvesafb also works on non-x86 system. It has one drawback though: it doesn't switch to graphical mode right from the start like vesafb does. Instead, you get the initial kernel messages in text mode and need to wait for graphics to kick-in. With v

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-18 Thread »Q«
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:43:19 + Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 18 January 2009 00:25:49 »Q« wrote: > > > I also have a 1280x800 screen and uvesafb works for me without > > distortion with this kernel video option in grub.conf: > > > > video=uvesafb:1280x800-32,mtrr:3,ywrap > > Do you hav

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-18 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 18 January 2009 00:25:49 »Q« wrote: > I also have a 1280x800 screen and uvesafb works for me without > distortion with this kernel video option in grub.conf: > > video=uvesafb:1280x800-32,mtrr:3,ywrap Do you have that resolution available in your BIOS? I read somewhere that uvesafb ca

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread »Q«
In <58965d8a0901171927q12cac290ocead4eb8409d9...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, »Q« wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:42:30 -0600 > >> You mean you are now successfully using uvesafb *without*

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, »Q« wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:42:30 -0600 >> Paul Hartman wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Hartman >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the ins

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009 19:27:53 Paul Hartman wrote: > >> Now I just need to find a good consolefont that doesn't look >> "squished" in 16:9 aspect ratio. Right now I'm using ter-112n (from >> terminus-fonts) and it's pretty good but still

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, »Q« wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:42:30 -0600 > Paul Hartman wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Hartman >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install >> > uvesafb from this page: >> > >> > http

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread »Q«
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:42:30 -0600 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install > > uvesafb from this page: > > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/ > > > > However

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:32:38 + Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009 19:27:53 Paul Hartman wrote: > > > Now I just need to find a good consolefont that doesn't look > > "squished" in 16:9 aspect ratio. Right now I'm using ter-112n (from > > terminus-fonts) and it's pretty good bu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday 16 January 2009 19:27:53 Paul Hartman wrote: > Now I just need to find a good consolefont that doesn't look > "squished" in 16:9 aspect ratio. Right now I'm using ter-112n (from > terminus-fonts) and it's pretty good but still a little too wide for > my taste. Thanks for the pointer to

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > rea...@newsguy.com wrote: >> Paul Hartman writes: >> >>> I'm ashamed to admit I made the most basic mistake. I compiled uvesafb >>> as a module. Oops! Compiled it as "Y" instead of "M" and now I have a >>> pair of Tux sitting atop my kernel boot screen and no more 80x

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-17 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Paul Hartman writes: I'm ashamed to admit I made the most basic mistake. I compiled uvesafb as a module. Oops! Compiled it as "Y" instead of "M" and now I have a pair of Tux sitting atop my kernel boot screen and no more 80x25 horror. :) Is there some difference in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-16 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:33 PM, wrote: > Paul Hartman writes: > >> I'm ashamed to admit I made the most basic mistake. I compiled uvesafb >> as a module. Oops! Compiled it as "Y" instead of "M" and now I have a >> pair of Tux sitting atop my kernel boot screen and no more 80x25 >> horror. :) >

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-16 Thread reader
Paul Hartman writes: > I'm ashamed to admit I made the most basic mistake. I compiled uvesafb > as a module. Oops! Compiled it as "Y" instead of "M" and now I have a > pair of Tux sitting atop my kernel boot screen and no more 80x25 > horror. :) Is there some difference in uvesafb and vesafb? I

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-15 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install > uvesafb from this page: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/ > > However, it does not work. Is it required to use initrd in order to > use uvesafb? (

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-15 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Paul Hartman wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install >> uvesafb from this page: >> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/ >> >> However, it does not work. Is it required to u

[gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?

2009-01-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Paul Hartman wrote: Hi, Does anyone here use uvesafb? I followed the instructions to install uvesafb from this page: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/ However, it does not work. Is it required to use initrd in order to use uvesafb? (because I don't use it...) the 80x25 looks abso