Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout... (Oops - slip of the thumb)

2006-02-28 Thread Alan E. Davis
Yes. I am using dispatch-conf. Do you find it to be adequate? Alan On 3/1/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/28/06, Alan E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > emerge --sync > > emerge --depclean > > revdep-rebuild > > glsa-check -f all > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread Seo Boon, NG
Wrote Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:50:01PM SGT: > On Monday 27 February 2006 10:39, "Seo Boon, NG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > about '[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...': > > I have the following error upon

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout... (Oops - slip of the thumb)

2006-02-28 Thread Richard Fish
On 2/28/06, Alan E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > emerge --sync > emerge --depclean > revdep-rebuild > glsa-check -f all > > The system seemed then to catch up with all of the inconsistencies. > Furthermore, the same has happened to me many times. Almost every

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread Richard Fish
On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /etc/conf.d/net only has one entry. > iface_eth0="dhcp" I believe this is incorrect. Looking at net.example from the same version of baselayout has no syntax for iface_eth0="dhcp". I think the correct syntax is now: config_eth0=( "dhcp" ) A

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout... (Oops - slip of the thumb)

2006-02-28 Thread Alan E. Davis
Oops, my thumb slipped before i had finished my message, so continuing, I had tried emerge --sync emerge --depclean revdep-rebuild glsa-check -f all The system seemed then to catch up with all of the inconsistencies. Furthermore, the same has happened to me many

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread Alan E. Davis
I am pretty much clueless, in general; however, I might report that I, too, recently experienced this same breakdown in all of the net interfaces on one of my machines. This appeared after a massive update to a ~x86 system involving over 700MB of downloads. It took several days to perform the upd

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 27 February 2006 10:39, "Seo Boon, NG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...': > I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout > upgrade. > > * No loaded modules

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread RockerZ71
On Monday 27 February 2006 12:52, Richard Fish wrote: > On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Bringing up lo > > * "127.0.0.1/8" > > * No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start) > > [ !! ] etc-update and then check out /etc/conf.d/net. I h

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-28 Thread Seo Boon, NG
Wrote Richard Fish on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:52:49AM SGT: > On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Bringing up lo > > * "127.0.0.1/8" > > * No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)[ > > !! ] > > Looks like your /etc/conf.d/net file is co

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-27 Thread Richard Fish
On 2/27/06, Seo Boon, NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Bringing up lo > * "127.0.0.1/8" > * No loaded modules provide ""127.0.0.1/8"" ("127.0.0.1/8"_start)[ > !! ] Looks like your /etc/conf.d/net file is confused. Please post the contents of that file, and also specify which ve

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seo Boon, NG wrote: >I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout upgrade. >My lo interface can comes alive after I manually do a "ifconfig lo up". Any I'm >operating a number of services on lo, I need lo to be up and running

[gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-27 Thread Seo Boon, NG
I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout upgrade. My lo interface can comes alive after I manually do a "ifconfig lo up". Any I'm operating a number of services on lo, I need lo to be up and running afteri each reboot. Any idea how to fix this? Thanks. init.d £ ./net.