On 06/25/2015 01:29 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
sufficient for a typical GUI program.
Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
guest... not particularly the smartest move, but it would account for
every
On Jun 25, 2015, at 11:47, Ralf ralf+gen...@ramses-pyramidenbau.de wrote:
On 06/25/2015 01:29 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
sufficient for a typical GUI program.
Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
Oh, I forgot about the gtk and sdl displays... I'll test them together
with QXL.
Thanks for your hint!
But anyways, I'll need two X servers when using this setup - one on the
VM and one on the hypervisor.
Shouldn't X11 forwarding be less overhead?
Thank you
Ralf
On 06/25/2015 05:44 AM,
What will the Qt application be doing? Any of those setups should be
sufficient for a typical GUI program.
Highest performance would probably be passing a discrete card to the
guest... not particularly the smartest move, but it would account for
every usecase. Barring that, #2 should have the
Hi out there,
assume the following situation:
I do have a minimalistic hypervisor running a minimalistic virtual
machine (qemu with kvm, qxl and spice).
Both systems, hypervisor and VM are able to run X servers and apllications.
The graphics card of the hypervisor is connected to a monitor. This
Ralf ralf+gen...@ramses-pyramidenbau.de wrote:
Hi out there,
assume the following situation:
I do have a minimalistic hypervisor running a minimalistic virtual
machine (qemu with kvm, qxl and spice).
Both systems, hypervisor and VM are able to run X servers and
apllications. The
6 matches
Mail list logo
