On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 21:26:20 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19:16PM +, Mick wrote
>
> > Perhaps I do not understand ... why should the chrooted system need
> > to use different flags?
>
> See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19:16PM +, Mick wrote
> Perhaps I do not understand ... why should the chrooted system need
> to use different flags?
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.4/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options
The desktop is "-march=ivybridge" and the
On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 16:31:31 Walter Dnes wrote:
> To repeat, the basic question I'm asking is how do I set up a "dual
> mode" in the chroot so that...
> - when the chroot is updating *ITSELF* it builds stuff "-march=native"
> and with its own CPU_FLAGS_X86, etc
> - when the chroot is
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:31:31 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> To repeat, the basic question I'm asking is how do I set up a "dual
> mode" in the chroot so that...
> - when the chroot is updating *ITSELF* it builds stuff "-march=native"
> and with its own CPU_FLAGS_X86, etc
> - when the chroot is
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:02:24AM +, Mick wrote
> You'll need to run in 32bit mode when chrooting of course:
>
> linux32 chroot /mnt/Atom_Build_env /bin/bash
> source /etc/profile
> export PS1="(Atom_Build) $PS1"
I'm already doing something similar with a 32-bit CentOS 6 chroot on a
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:38:21 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Oh, and you don't need a package server, just export PKGDIR via NFS
> > and mount it on the netbook.
>
> I see nfs as being more complex with kernel settings required for
> client and server, not to mention config files all over the
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:02:24 +, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 00:22:51 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > If the chroot is identical to your netbooks's install in terms of
> > *FLAGS, USE, @world etc, then yes. I used to do it this way when I
> > had an Atom netbook. I even build for a low
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:22:51AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
> If the chroot is identical to your netbooks's install in terms of
> *FLAGS, USE, @world etc, then yes. I used to do it this way when I had an
> Atom netbook. I even build for a low memory 486 system in the same way.
Unfortunately,
On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 00:22:51 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:34:47 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Reading https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide still leaves
> >
> > me uncertain. I have an ancient 32-bit Atom netbook. I've installed
> > uclibc-ng Gentoo on it.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:34:47 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Reading https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide still leaves
> me uncertain. I have an ancient 32-bit Atom netbook. I've installed
> uclibc-ng Gentoo on it. Building big packages on it is a pain. I can
> do an identical
Reading https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide still leaves
me uncertain. I have an ancient 32-bit Atom netbook. I've installed
uclibc-ng Gentoo on it. Building big packages on it is a pain. I can
do an identical install in a QEMU VM, and distcc into it. But that
doesn't catch
11 matches
Mail list logo
