On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:33:48 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>One more question if I might. What's the simplest way to regenerate
> the kernel when there are no kernel changes but you have changes to
> the programs that are going into the initramfs? make clean seems like
> overkill to me, and it's v
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> At th
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
At this point I don't know that 1) the image is actually in the
>
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>> At this point I don't know that 1) the image is actually in the
>>> kernel, or 2) that my "init thingy" ;-) image would work
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> At this point I don't know that 1) the image is actually in the
>> kernel, or 2) that my "init thingy" ;-) image would work, but at least
>> the process of putting it together is ver
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> At this point I don't know that 1) the image is actually in the
> kernel, or 2) that my "init thingy" ;-) image would work, but at least
> the process of putting it together is verifiable.
That's why I put in all the debug stuff, so I could
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 12:48:38 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On the mdadm list one comment came up which was to make sure
> my mdadm.conf file was up to date and then include it in the initramfs
> image so that if for some reason the machine doesn't boot I have all
> the info required to start the RAI
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Actually, I think the initramfs wiki covers this, albeit it's 'not
> easy'. Their words.
>
> I think I'm covered for now.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
While extracting it from the kernel image may be involved, and for now
using Neil's example init scri
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> One other question came up. So I build the kernel, and the kernel build
> creates the initramfs image and embeds it in the kernel. Is there a tool
> that would allow me to query the embedded image prior to booting
> so that I can check that e
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:58:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> 2) Contained executables, as I understand them, either need to be
>> built with the static flag or you have to include all the libraries.
>> Static seems simpler so (in my case) sho
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:58:34 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>OK, it's the day after Christmas and this little kid wants to play
> with the new toys Uncle Neil gave us yesterday - a copy of his well
> worn setup file for building an initramfs into the kernel - a copy of
> which I place here:
>
> [Q
Hi,
OK, it's the day after Christmas and this little kid wants to play
with the new toys Uncle Neil gave us yesterday - a copy of his well
worn setup file for building an initramfs into the kernel - a copy of
which I place here:
[QUOTE]
This is the file I use on a system that has / on a LUKS f
12 matches
Mail list logo
