Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/03/2013 04:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Sub-slots_and_Slot-Operators > > I'd already found much the same info in devmanual by the time I got and > read your reply. So let's see if I understand this now: > Beats me. I know what they're supposed to do, but ha

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > I'm a cynical old fart who's seen it all (more than once) before si > I'm inclined to reply with "yes, portage is getting smarter about > breakages" and append to that "by fixing one problem - revdep-rebuild > - and introducing a vast slew of new! shiny! improved! wonderful b

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/02/2013 01:22, Dale wrote: >> Is this all starting to sound maybe just a little bit like some magic >> > that will make @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild redundant? We need >> > those tools because portage does not know what so versions will work >> > fine with what, and these sub-slots a

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 03/02/2013 21:09, Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> emerge -e --keep-going @world >>> shows output like this when a build fails: >>> >>> * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: >>> * >>> * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by: >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/02/2013 21:09, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> emerge -e --keep-going @world >> shows output like this when a build fails: >> >> * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: >> * >> * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by: >> * (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/02/2013 21:28, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/03/2013 01:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> emerge -e --keep-going @world >> shows output like this when a build fails: >> >> * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: >> * >> * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/03/2013 01:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > emerge -e --keep-going @world > shows output like this when a build fails: > > * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: > * > * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by: > * (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-r1::gentoo, insta

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > emerge -e --keep-going @world > shows output like this when a build fails: > > * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: > * > * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by: > * (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-r1::gentoo, installed) > > I can't parse t

[gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output

2013-02-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
emerge -e --keep-going @world shows output like this when a build fails: * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: * * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by: * (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-r1::gentoo, installed) I can't parse that. What kind of SLOT is "0/50=" ?

Re: [gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2009-08-25 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 25/08/09 Crístian Viana said: > yes, but you're already using an unstable version of django. Not according to the Django developers. :) Anywho, I'll uninstall it for now. Mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2009-08-25 Thread Crístian Viana
> > Is this saying that it can't update django without pulling in an unstable > eselect-python? > yes, but you're already using an unstable version of django. -- Crístian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1]

[gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2009-08-25 Thread Michael P. Soulier
Hi there, I haven't updated in a while, and I went to do so today and received this msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --update --pretend world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=app-admin/eselect-python-20090804

Re: [gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2008-04-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > > You don't currently have rhino installed so when you issue "emerge > > rhino", portage will check for the latest one and install it. It > > just so happens that in this case, the latest is not the same SLOT > > that OOo wants. > > Crystal clear.

Re: [gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2008-04-23 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:33:05 +0200 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> # emerge --verbose --ask --deep --update --newuse --tree world >> >> gives just a few packages with dev-java/rhino the last one (first to >> be merged). >> >> But >>

Re: [gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2008-04-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > # emerge --verbose --ask --deep --update --newuse --tree world > > gives just a few packages with dev-java/rhino the last one (first to > be merged). > > But > > # emerge --oneshot --ask rhino > > Gives a bunch of packages with rhino the last o

[gentoo-user] confusing emerge output

2008-04-22 Thread Allan Gottlieb
# emerge --verbose --ask --deep --update --newuse --tree world gives just a few packages with dev-java/rhino the last one (first to be merged). But # emerge --oneshot --ask rhino Gives a bunch of packages with rhino the last one (last to build). Could someone explain? thanks, allan =