On Monday, 23 November 2020 21:47:11 GMT Jack wrote:
> For many years, I've had this small script in my home directory -
> unfortunately I rarely remember to use it. I have no idea
> where I got it, but it's got a timestamp of about four years ago.
> However, now that I actually look at it,
> the
On Tuesday, 24 November 2020 09:28:13 GMT I wrote:
> There should be a one-liner in awk too. Someone will come
along in a minute
> and tell us. At least, I hope so because I'd like to use it too.
I should have added my thanks for the script. Rude of me.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On Monday, 23 November 2020 21:47:11 GMT Jack wrote:
> For many years, I've had this small script in my home directory -
> unfortunately I rarely remember to use it. I have no idea where I got
> it, but it's got a timestamp of about four years ago. However, now
> that I actually look at it, the
Jack wrote:
> On 2020.11.23 15:00, Dale wrote:
>> Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:24 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>> >> *blush* Even though I'm using "date" since umpteen years, up to
>> now I
>> >> was not aware of this "@..." syntax. You're perfectly right,
>> that
On 2020.11.23 15:00, Dale wrote:
Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:24 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>> *blush* Even though I'm using "date" since umpteen years, up to
now I
>> was not aware of this "@..." syntax. You're perfectly right,
that's ex-
>> actly what I wa
Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:24 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>> *blush* Even though I'm using "date" since umpteen years, up to now I
>> was not aware of this "@..." syntax. You're perfectly right, that's ex-
>> actly what I was looking for.
> I wasn't either, until
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 19:24 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> *blush* Even though I'm using "date" since umpteen years, up to now I
> was not aware of this "@..." syntax. You're perfectly right, that's ex-
> actly what I was looking for.
I wasn't either, until I read the man page. Just goes to
Matt and also Mathew,
On Monday, 2020-11-23 11:46:56 -0600, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> ...
> Is the basic `date` from coreutils sufficient? If so, no need to
> reinvent the wheel, unless I'm misunderstanding your need.
>
> Example:
>
> $ date --date='@21'
> 2037-12-14T17:00:44 CST
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 18:28 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> looking for a small, fast utility (preferably written in C) accepting a
> Unix time (seconds since 1970-01-01) as argument and printing the corr-
> esponding local time to standard output.
Is the basic `date` from coreutils sufficient?
You might be able to use this shell command:
TZ=US/Pacific date --date='@2147483647'
- Matthew
On 11/23/20 12:28 PM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Greetings,
looking for a small, fast utility (preferably written in C) accepting a
Unix time (seconds since 1970-01-01) as argument and printing the corr-
esponding local time to standard output.
Any pointers?
Sincerely,
Rainer
I'm not aware
Greetings,
looking for a small, fast utility (preferably written in C) accepting a
Unix time (seconds since 1970-01-01) as argument and printing the corr-
esponding local time to standard output.
Any pointers?
Sincerely,
Rainer
12 matches
Mail list logo
