On 2010-08-03 23:57, Bill Longman wrote:
> He's not doing on a physical volume, they just happen to show up. He's
> just using "fdisk -l" to generally see what volumes are out there.
Ah, ok. Misunderstanding from my side...
Best regards
Peter K
On 08/03/2010 02:16 PM, pk wrote:
> On 2010-08-03 18:20, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
>> fdisk -l
>
>> Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table
>
> Why are you using fdisk on a logical volume? To my knowledge (which of
> course may be outdated/wrong) an LV doesn't contain a partition
On 2010-08-03 18:20, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> fdisk -l
> Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table
Why are you using fdisk on a logical volume? To my knowledge (which of
course may be outdated/wrong) an LV doesn't contain a partition table so
looking for it with fdisk -l shouldn't
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After a recent sync and new kernel built, I get these messages from
> fdisk -l that did not use to get before. Searching the web, it appears
> that fdisk is listing my LVM partitions. Why is it doing now? It has
> never done i
On 08/03/2010 09:20 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After a recent sync and new kernel built, I get these messages from
> fdisk -l that did not use to get before. Searching the web, it appears
> that fdisk is listing my LVM partitions. Why is it doing now? It has
> never done it befor
Hello,
After a recent sync and new kernel built, I get these messages from
fdisk -l that did not use to get before. Searching the web, it appears
that fdisk is listing my LVM partitions. Why is it doing now? It has
never done it before.
Thanks,
--
Valmor
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/dm-0: 26.8 GB, 268
6 matches
Mail list logo