Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak?

2019-01-27 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:58:13 PM CET Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:02:39PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:48 PM Grant Edwards > > > > wrote: > > > I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of > > > handling HTML.

Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak?

2019-01-26 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:02:39PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:48 PM Grant Edwards > wrote: > > > I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of > > handling HTML. After doing a bit of reading I decided the first one > > to try would be Geary.

Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak?

2019-01-25 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:48 PM Grant Edwards wrote: > I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of > handling HTML. After doing a bit of reading I decided the first one > to try would be Geary. > > Bzzt! > > Though it's in the portage tree unamasked and marked stable, you

email client: was: [gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak?

2019-01-25 Thread Jack
On 2019.01.25 13:48, Grant Edwards wrote: I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of handling HTML. After doing a bit of reading I decided the first one to try would be Geary. I can't help you with flatpack, but have you tried balsa for an email client? I mostly use

[gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak?

2019-01-25 Thread Grant Edwards
I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of handling HTML. After doing a bit of reading I decided the first one to try would be Geary. Bzzt! Though it's in the portage tree unamasked and marked stable, you can't actually _build_ it, since it requires an old, vulnerable