Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Alan Grimes wrote: > Dale wrote: >> Dale wrote: >> >> This is something I have noticed that changed since the gcc upgrade. >> One, Firefox seems to use less memory. It's not a whole lot less but it >> is less for sure. It also uses a lot less CPU power. Used to if I had >> two or three Firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Dale wrote: > Dale wrote: > > This is something I have noticed that changed since the gcc upgrade. > One, Firefox seems to use less memory. It's not a whole lot less but it > is less for sure. It also uses a lot less CPU power. Used to if I had > two or three Firefox profiles running, I could

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Dale wrote: > > I just did this myself. After I switched to the new gcc, I ran > revdep-rebuild. It had a large list of packages. I was planning to do > a emerge -e world anyway, so I just did it instead. No sense doing most > of it twice. During the rebuild, I had a qt package to fail. For

[gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0 again

Hello list, I issued this command: # revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude="gcc gentoo- sources" --jobs --load-average=48 ...only to find that gentoo-sources was indeed emerged, though gcc wasn't. What's gone wrong here? I've always found that style of specifying exclusions

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On 04/25/2017 12:18 PM, Dale wrote: Frank Steinmetzger wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 06:59:16PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: My personal advice & experience: * install the new gcc-5.4 * switch to it * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above) ... and everything should

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 06:59:16PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >> My personal advice & experience: >> * install the new gcc-5.4 >> * switch to it >> * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above) >> ... and everything should be fine. > I do

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 06:59:16PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > My personal advice & experience: > * install the new gcc-5.4 > * switch to it > * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above) > ... and everything should be fine. I do remember having seen the item. And I

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 04:07:03PM +, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> I've had the odd rebuild failure here & there, don't bother re-emerging > >> it until revdep-rebuild has finished. Any dependencies it needs would > >> have been rebuilt by then and it should complete without problem. > Usually

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Philip Webb wrote: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. > > The first pkg I tried to compile with 5.4.0 indeed failed at that

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Yes, I had too, once. At that time though quite a few packages could > only be emerged with -j1, so I had to make exceptions for them. It was > easier just to put the options into an alias: > > $ alias emerj='sudo emerge --jobs=24

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 16:45:58 I wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On April 24, 2017 5:45:58 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: >> On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six >> > hours on two systems

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > machine) and still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:47:32 Mick wrote: > On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six > > hours on two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower > > machine) and still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 14:36:01 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Speaking of long emerge times, so far this box has spent nearly six hours on > two systems simultaneously (one being a chroot for a slower machine) and > still hasn't finished. And qtwebkit has just failed; I'd better look into > that. I've

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Monday 24 Apr 2017 11:11:09 Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 10:13:29 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey: > > On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > > > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took > > > about 2 days on my desktop just for the

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 10:13:29 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey: > On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took about > > 2 days on my desktop just for the revdep-rebuild. > > I couldn't face the prospect of

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Sunday 23 Apr 2017 15:26:48 Marc Joliet wrote: > I followed the instructions and everything went fine, albeit it took about > 2 days on my desktop just for the revdep-rebuild. I couldn't face the prospect of line-by-line emerging of 341 packages taking hours or days, so I added "--jobs=X

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

170423 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 07:45:49 CEST schrieb Philip Webb: >> What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > My personal advice & experience: > * install the new gcc-5.4 > * switch to it > * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above)

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 18:59:16 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > > > What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > > My personal advice & experience: > * install the new gcc-5.4 > * switch to it > * run the revdep-rebuild command from the news item (see above) > ... and everything

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 07:45:49 CEST schrieb Philip Webb: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. > > The first pkg I

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On Sonntag, 23. April 2017 07:45:49 CEST Philip Webb wrote: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. While it does read like

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

> I went back to GCC 4.9.3 & the pkg merged without any problem. > > What are other users' experiences using GCC 5.4.0 ? > ~amd64 users have been using it for ages, with no problems. I have one system that seems to need me to run ldconfig when i update gcc, but the others are fine.

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

On 04/22/2017 10:45 PM, Philip Webb wrote: > I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. > There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI > & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. > > The first pkg I tried to compile with

[gentoo-user] GCC 5.4.0

I've been following the thread re GCC 5.4.0 & after 'eix-sync' installed it. There's a news item warning that there's a new ABI & it mb necessary to run 'revdep-rebuild' if it fails with a linking error. The first pkg I tried to compile with 5.4.0 indeed failed at that point, so I followed the