Re: [gentoo-user] GLSA «201110-01 / openssl» and acroread-9.4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:29:28 -0200 Urs Schutz u.sch...@bluewin.ch wrote: As far as I know acroread is not unmasked in this installation, nor is openssl # grep -i acro /etc/portage/* # grep -i ssl /etc/portage/* shows nothing, so acroread and ssl is «stable». For now I just

Re: [gentoo-user] GLSA «201110-01 / openssl» and acroread-9.4.2

2012-01-17 Thread Urs Schutz
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:35:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:29:28 -0200 Urs Schutz u.sch...@bluewin.ch wrote: As far as I know acroread is not unmasked in this installation, nor is openssl # grep -i acro /etc/portage/* # grep -i ssl

[gentoo-user] GLSA «201110-01 / openssl» and acroread-9.4.2

2012-01-16 Thread Urs Schutz
Today I see the following: I uninstalled dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8s-r1 because there is a GLSA (201110-01 / openssl) against it. But acroread-9.4.2 wants the installation of openssl-0.9.8s-r1: # emerge -uDpvtN world These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating