Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Mark Knecht wrote: > > > I'm planning on my new rig having the Ryzen 5900X.  Is the 5950 > better?  While I've kinda picked that one, I'm open to ideas if it is > faster and I can afford it.  As it is, I'm looking at between $300 and > $350 for the 5900.  My last CPU cost a little over $100. > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Saturday, 14 October 2023 04:21:23 BST Dale wrote: > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:35:21PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > >>> Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > Why don't you test throughput without encryption to

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Friday, 13 October 2023 18:01:41 BST Dale wrote: > Michael wrote: > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > >> root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > >> # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > >> PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:35:21PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >>> Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: >>> Why don't you test throughput without encryption to confirm your assumption? >>> What does `cryptsetup

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:35:21PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > > > >> Why don't you test throughput without encryption to confirm your > >> assumption? > > What does `cryptsetup benchmark` say? I used to use a

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

> I'm planning on my new rig having the Ryzen 5900X. Is the 5950 better? While I've kinda picked that one, I'm open to ideas if it is faster and I can afford it. As it is, I'm looking at between $300 and $350 for the 5900. My last CPU cost a little over $100. > I'm not going to say one is

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:02 AM Dale > wrote: > > > > Michael wrote: > > > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > > > > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:02 AM Dale wrote: > > Michael wrote: > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Michael wrote: > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > >> root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark >> # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). >> PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key >> PBKDF2-sha256 911805 iterations per second for

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key > PBKDF2-sha256 911805 iterations per second for 256-bit key >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > >> Why don't you test throughput without encryption to confirm your assumption? > What does `cryptsetup benchmark` say? I used to use a Celeron G1840 in my > NAS, which is Intel Haswell without AES_NI. It was

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > > It only does this when I'm copying files over. Right now I'm copying > > about 26TBs of data over ethernet and it is taking a while. Once I > > stop it or it finishes the copy, the CPU goes to about nothing, > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Thursday, 12 October 2023 21:50:28 BST Dale wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:36:17 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> Neil Bothwick wrote: > >>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:52:58 -0500, Dale wrote: > It only does this when I'm copying files over. Right now I'm copying > about

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:36:17 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:52:58 -0500, Dale wrote: >>> It only does this when I'm copying files over.  Right now I'm copying about 26TBs of data over ethernet and it is taking a while. 

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:36:17 -0500, Dale wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:52:58 -0500, Dale wrote: > > > >> It only does this when I'm copying files over.  Right now I'm copying > >> about 26TBs of data over ethernet and it is taking a while.  Once I > >> stop it or it

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:52:58 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> It only does this when I'm copying files over.  Right now I'm copying >> about 26TBs of data over ethernet and it is taking a while.  Once I stop >> it or it finishes the copy, the CPU goes to about nothing, unless I'm >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:52:58 -0500, Dale wrote: > It only does this when I'm copying files over.  Right now I'm copying > about 26TBs of data over ethernet and it is taking a while.  Once I stop > it or it finishes the copy, the CPU goes to about nothing, unless I'm > doing something else.  So it

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Jude DaShiell wrote: > Linux is being targeted by ransomware and other forms of malware so it may > be worthwhile to run ferensics on your backup and find what ferensics have > to tell you. After check and see if any of what you found out were false > positives. > > > -- Jude "There are four

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Linux is being targeted by ransomware and other forms of malware so it may be worthwhile to run ferensics on your backup and find what ferensics have to tell you. After check and see if any of what you found out were false positives. -- Jude "There are four boxes to be used in defense of

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 07:44:06PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> Just as a update.  The file system I was trying to do a file system >> check on was my large one, about 40TBs worth.  While running the file >> system check, it started using HUGE amounts of memory.  It used

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Am Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 07:44:06PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > Just as a update.  The file system I was trying to do a file system > check on was my large one, about 40TBs worth.  While running the file > system check, it started using HUGE amounts of memory.  It used almost > all my 32GBs and most of

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Dale > > wrote: >> > >> > Howdy, >> > >> > I use Konsole a lot, that thing within KDE that acts like a console. >> > Anyway, I'm running a offline file system check on a rather large file >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Dale > wrote: > > > > Howdy, > > > > I use Konsole a lot, that thing within KDE that acts like a console. > > Anyway, I'm running a offline file system check on a rather large file > > system.  For some reason,

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Dale wrote: > > Howdy, > > I use Konsole a lot, that thing within KDE that acts like a console. > Anyway, I'm running a offline file system check on a rather large file > system. For some reason, Konsole decided to crash. I can see the file > system is still

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

If I understand your question, this may help. Understand prog is the program that errors out in this example: prog 2>&1 | tee prog.err Look for all output including errors in the file prog.err which tee will have created for you and before opening prog.err try wc-l prog.err and grep -i error

[gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Howdy, I use Konsole a lot, that thing within KDE that acts like a console.  Anyway, I'm running a offline file system check on a rather large file system.  For some reason, Konsole decided to crash.  I can see the file system is still running with top, ps etc but I can't see anything to know