On 29/08/2013 08:54, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Hello list!
Here's my scenario:
Currently there is a server performing 2 functions; one runs on, let's
say, port 2000, and another one runs on port 3000.
Due to some necessary changes, especially the need to (1) provide more
resource for a function,
Hello list!
Here's my scenario:
Currently there is a server performing 2 functions; one runs on, let's
say, port 2000, and another one runs on port 3000.
Due to some necessary changes, especially the need to (1) provide more
resource for a function, and (2) delegate management of the functions
Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using domain
names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to silently
introduce things like load balancers later on if you ever need to scale. It's
also much easier to communicate to new users how to find this
On 08/29/2013 01:12 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using domain
names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to silently
introduce things like load balancers later on if you ever need to scale. It's
also much easier to
On Aug 29, 2013 7:46 PM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
On 08/29/2013 01:12 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using
domain names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to
silently introduce things like load balancers
On Aug 29, 2013 7:13 PM, Randy Barlow ra...@electronsweatshop.com wrote:
Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using
domain names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to
silently introduce things like load balancers later on if you ever need to
scale.
6 matches
Mail list logo
