On 02/06/10 14:53, Dale wrote:
> Jake Moe wrote:
>> On 01/06/10 21:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:46:33 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
My question is: is there a way that Portage can compare what's
currently on the hard disk with what it installed, and
Jake Moe wrote:
On 01/06/10 21:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:46:33 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
My question is: is there a way that Portage can compare what's
currently on the hard disk with what it installed, and do some sort of
checksum verification on it?
P
On 01/06/10 21:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:46:33 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
>
>
>> My question is: is there a way that Portage can compare what's
>> currently on the hard disk with what it installed, and do some sort of
>> checksum verification on it?
>>
> Portage record
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:46:33 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
> My question is: is there a way that Portage can compare what's
> currently on the hard disk with what it installed, and do some sort of
> checksum verification on it?
Portage records a checksum for each file it installs, that's how it known
The other night, my laptop decided it didn't want to start Gentoo
anymore. Long story short, I ended up using fsck to fix the disk, after
which it booted ok. However, the fsck was a bit destructive; at the
very least, a few files from my torrents had gone corrupt. That's not a
big deal; Vuze let
5 matches
Mail list logo
