Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-12 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/11/2016 04:51 PM, J. García wrote: > El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 16:27 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >> I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During >> a >> discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, th

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-12 Thread R0b0t1
Pale Moon is routinely behind Firefox on security fixes (actual fixes, not wanking-in-a-corner fixes).

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-12 Thread konsolebox
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:27:42 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: >> I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a >> discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems >> to be that "-f

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-12 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:27:42 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a > discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems > to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default. Is that o? > I'd like to

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread J.
El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 20:47 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote > > > so it is not turned on on x86. Not sure about amd64. IIRC it is > > default > > on amd64, but I am not sure and too lazy to google. Just like the > > t

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread waltdnes
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote > so it is not turned on on x86. Not sure about amd64. IIRC it is default > on amd64, but I am not sure and too lazy to google. Just like the thread > starter. Actually, I did Google. So did another particpant in the Pale Moo

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am 11.07.2016 um 22:51 schrieb J. García: > El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 16:27 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >> I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During >> a >> discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion >> seems >> to be that "-fomit-frame-p

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread J.
El lun, 11-07-2016 a las 16:27 -0400, waltd...@waltdnes.org escribió: >   I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there.  During > a > discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion > seems > to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default.  Is that > correct? >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread Michael Cook
On 07/11/2016 04:27 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default. Is that correct? I'd like to simplify my CFLA

[gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default?

2016-07-11 Thread waltdnes
I put it into CFLAGS/CCFLAGS years ago, and left it there. During a discussion on the Pale Moon forum about build options, the opinion seems to be that "-fomit-frame-pointer" is now the default. Is that correct? I'd like to simplify my CFLAGS/CCFLAGS both in Gentoo and the Pale Moon build proce