Hi,
I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience
with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)?
I'd like to swich ext3 for something more modern, and none
of JFS/ZFS/Reiser/ext4 has all the features I'm looking for.
Btrfs looks interesting, but I'm not sure if it is
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 15:48, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience
with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)?
I'd like to swich ext3 for something more modern, and none
of JFS/ZFS/Reiser/ext4 has all the features I'm
On 21-Sep-11 21:55, Doug Hunley wrote:
I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience
with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)?
I use it as my main fs here and have had no issues. Having said that,
there is NO functional fsck at this time. And abrupt power issues
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:12:35 +0200, Jarry wrote:
Really no fsck? I've heard fedora was going to use btrfs
as main filesystem in upcomming release 16 (to be released
in about a month). How could they do it without fsck?
They can't, that's why they've postponed it until until 17. Btrfs will be
Jarry writes:
On 21-Sep-11 21:55, Doug Hunley wrote:
I'd like to ask if anybody here has already some experience
with Btrfs? Is it usable (although not officialy stable)?
I use it as my main fs here and have had no issues. Having said that,
there is NO functional fsck at this time. And
Tried it one FS to test - looked good
tried it on a few file systems - seemed to take punishment that killed
the ext2/3 FS every time
Then every one died within a month with unrecoverable errors of one type
or another (power crash caused corruption that couldnt be fixed, unknown
problems, long
Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using
compression, inode_cache and space_cache.
However, I wouldn't use it on a system i didn't have a backup for.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using
compression, inode_cache and space_cache.
Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then,
yeah, you're adding some serious overhead
Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using
compression, inode_cache and space_cache.
Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then,
yeah, you're adding some serious overhead and real latency.
Sorry I wasn't clear. Compression, inode_cache and
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok for me so far, but still seems slower than ext4, and i'm using
compression, inode_cache and space_cache.
Does ext4 have compression? I didn't know it did. If it doesn't, then,
yeah, you're adding some serious
10 matches
Mail list logo
