On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:53:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First off, doesn't one of the boot scripts clean /tmp? Or is that just
> my imagination?
A full clean is optional, and I think it defaults to off
# /etc/conf.d/bootmisc
# Should we completely wipe out /tmp or just selectively remove
On 7/29/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 23 July 2006 13:18, Mick wrote:
> I checked the script I have in my /etc/X11/Sessions/fluxbox:
> ==
> eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)"
> /usr/bin/startfluxbox
> kill `echo ${GPG_AGENT_INFO} | cut -d ':'
On Sunday 23 July 2006 13:18, Mick wrote:
> I checked the script I have in my /etc/X11/Sessions/fluxbox:
> ==
> eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)"
> /usr/bin/startfluxbox
> kill `echo ${GPG_AGENT_INFO} | cut -d ':' -f 2`
> ==
>
> Running these separ
Thanks Philip,
On Sunday 23 July 2006 14:29, Philip Webb wrote:
> 060723 Philip Webb wrote:
> I deleted all the sh-np's in my own /tmp & rebooted without any problem.
I assume what you say is that they were not recreated?
> Also looking in my archives at the output of Elog ,
> there were 2
060723 Philip Webb wrote:
> 060722 Mick wrote:
>> I noticed in /tmp a rather large number of files of the type:
>> prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 23:13 sh-np-1151622697
> It looks like part of the calculation of dependences.
> I have a long list roughly daily from 050213-611 ,
> s
060722 Mick wrote:
> I noticed in /tmp a rather large number of files of the type:
> prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 23:13 sh-np-1151622697
> prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 17:44 sh-np-1151623392
> prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 17:44 sh-np-115162381
Hi All,
I was checking my /tmp and noticed a rather large number of two different
types of files. By far the largest number (some hundreds of files) are of
the type:
prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 23:13 sh-np-1151622697
prw--- 1 rootroot 0 Jun 29 17:44 sh-np-115
7 matches
Mail list logo
