Wol wrote:
> On 17/02/2022 07:42, Dale wrote:
>> I also commented out as much as I could in
>> package.use, the things I'd tried previously. Now it has a clean path
>> to upgrade.
>
> Is package.use a file or a directory? If it's a file, convert it to a
> directory (you can just put the existing
On 17/02/2022 07:42, Dale wrote:
I also commented out as much as I could in
package.use, the things I'd tried previously. Now it has a clean path
to upgrade.
Is package.use a file or a directory? If it's a file, convert it to a
directory (you can just put the existing package.use file in the
Hi Miles,
This install is likely over 10 years old. I might add, I copied a lot
of things over from my previous system which was a AMD 2500+ single core
puter. In a way, some things could be dating back to around 2003 or
2004. I use eix-test-obsolete to clean up package.* files but there
isn't
threads very rarely makes sense for anything, btw.
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 21:41, Miles Malone
wrote:
>
> Now for your own sanity you might consider stopping adding things
> globally constantly, and using app-portage/flaggie to sanely manage
> them per-package... Cause there's far more use flags
Now for your own sanity you might consider stopping adding things
globally constantly, and using app-portage/flaggie to sanely manage
them per-package... Cause there's far more use flags that make sense
per-package than make sense globally. I used to manage them all
largely globally like ten
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:42:39 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> P. S. Is there a tool to make the USE line in make.conf in alphabetical
>> order or something? When I add things, I try to put them in order so it
>> is easier to find them. For some reason, they are out of order, a
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 01:42:39 -0600, Dale wrote:
> P. S. Is there a tool to make the USE line in make.conf in alphabetical
> order or something? When I add things, I try to put them in order so it
> is easier to find them. For some reason, they are out of order, a lot.
> Something at some
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 08:02, Dale wrote:
>> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "> unmet requirements.
>> - sci-libs/hdf5-1.10.5-r1::gentoo USE="cxx hl threads zlib -debug
>> -examples -fortran -mpi -szip -unsupported" ABI_X86="(64)"
>>
>> The following REQUIRED_USE flag
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 08:02, Dale wrote:
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy " unmet requirements.
> - sci-libs/hdf5-1.10.5-r1::gentoo USE="cxx hl threads zlib -debug
> -examples -fortran -mpi -szip -unsupported" ABI_X86="(64)"
>
> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
Miles Malone wrote:
> Well I just installed kicad-meta (6.0.1), and neither vtk nor hdf5 are
> pulled into the dep tree as a result... Given opencascade[vtk] is
> what's pulling in vtk in your emerge above, disabling the vtk
> useflag's probably going to help.
>
> In addition, I cant imagine why
Well I just installed kicad-meta (6.0.1), and neither vtk nor hdf5 are
pulled into the dep tree as a result... Given opencascade[vtk] is
what's pulling in vtk in your emerge above, disabling the vtk
useflag's probably going to help.
In addition, I cant imagine why in a million years MPI should
Miles Malone wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Try removing the vtk useflag from opencascade. Also, add verbose to
> your emerge arguments and it may show you the full RDEPEND
>
> Regards,
>
> Miles
>
>
I already have -v in my make.conf defaults. So it is already there I
just don't have to type it. I
Hi Dale,
Try removing the vtk useflag from opencascade. Also, add verbose to
your emerge arguments and it may show you the full RDEPEND
Regards,
Miles
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 11:07, Dale wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I seem to have ran into a road block. To get a clean path for emerge
> recently, I
Howdy,
I seem to have ran into a road block. To get a clean path for emerge
recently, I had to unmerge a few packages. I removed Kicad, libreoffice
and a few others. Some of them I could add back with no problem. I
just emerged them and off it went. I'm having trouble with libreoffice
but I
14 matches
Mail list logo
