On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 21:24:15 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 17:32:16 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Is it not part of the Mozilla suite anymore? Try seamonkey or
> > seamonkey-bin, which is the current incarnation of the suite.
>
> Yes, I find that Seamonkey has a Composer comp
On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 17:32:16 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Is it not part of the Mozilla suite anymore? Try seamonkey or
> seamonkey-bin, which is the current incarnation of the suite.
Yes, I find that Seamonkey has a Composer component, but it seems not to have a
CSS editor like that of the o
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:32:22PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I used to use Kompozer (part of the Mozilla suite) but time has passed and
> now
> the libraries it needs are no longer in portage. That's using the binary.
> Attempting to build it from source according to these ins
Hi list,
I used to use Kompozer (part of the Mozilla suite) but time has passed and now
the libraries it needs are no longer in portage. That's using the binary.
Attempting to build it from source according to these instructions [1] fails
too because the script can't find some other libraries.
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 09:12:04 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote:
> > A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to
> > Komodo-edit?
>
> I was too terse a moment ago. I haven't seen Komodo-edit, but from the list
> of features on Softpedia's sit
On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote:
> A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to
> Komodo-edit?
I was too terse a moment ago. I haven't seen Komodo-edit, but from the list of
features on Softpedia's site it seems to omit the one thing I use Kompozer for:
WYSIWYG st
On Monday 02 May 2011 21:18:00 Mick wrote:
> A bit O/T to the original post, but how does kompozer compares to
> Komodo-edit?
Never heard of it. I'd better investigate.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Monday 02 May 2011 20:12:11 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2011 17:54:18 Paul Hartman wrote:
> > I bet you got it from Bugzilla, because you're CC'ed on this:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146761
> >
> > :)
>
> I bow to your superior detective-work. :-)
A bit O/T to
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:54:18 Paul Hartman wrote:
> I bet you got it from Bugzilla, because you're CC'ed on this:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146761
>
> :)
I bow to your superior detective-work. :-)
--
Rgds
Peter
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011 20:28:14 Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> I don't see kompozer in portage at all. Is it in an overlay?
>
> Now that you ask, I don't remember how I came by it, but I have an ebuild and
> so
> on in /usr/local/portage. I wa
On Friday 29 April 2011 10:03:30 I wrote:
> I don't remember how I came by it, but I have an ebuild and so on in
> /usr/local/portage. I was also astonished to find, after I wrote, that I also
> have a package of it from last time I did manage to get it emerged, last June.
> I tried emerging that
On Thursday 28 April 2011 20:28:14 Paul Hartman wrote:
> I don't see kompozer in portage at all. Is it in an overlay?
Now that you ask, I don't remember how I came by it, but I have an ebuild and
so
on in /usr/local/portage. I was also astonished to find, after I wrote, that I
also have a pack
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've been trying to install kompozer (very useful for developing web style
> sheets), but it fails with a whole lot of errors such as the one in the
> subject.
>
> Googling only shows a conversation from two-and-a-half year
On 13/03/10 11:40, Peter Humphrey wrote
> Ah. So now it builds ok (18 min here) but when I call "kompozer" from a
> command line I get:
>
> /usr/lib/kompozer/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 13315 Segmentation fault
> "$prog" ${1+"$@"}
>
All I know is that it worked here from when I installed
On Saturday 13 March 2010 08:27:08 Neil Walker wrote:
> http://www.neiljw.net/mozconfig-0.8_beta1
>
> Put that file in the files subdirectory of wherever you have the
> ebuild then remake the manifest. The emerge starts with a warning
> about mozconfig.eclass but you can just ignore that. Then go
To those people still trying to download the files, please
note there is NO full stop (period) at the end of the ebuild
filename. The two files you need are:
http://www.neiljw.net/kompozer-0.8_beta1.ebuild
and
http://www.neiljw.net/mozconfig-0.8_beta1
;)
Be lucky,
Neil
http://www.neiljw.co
On 12/03/10 23:21, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> I got an ebuild somewhere, probably bugzilla. If you want a copy,
>> I've put it on http://www.neiljw.net/kompozer-0.8_beta1.ebuild.
>>
> I tried this just now. I saved your ebuild as /usr/local/portage/app-
> editors/kompozer/kompozer-0.8_beta1.ebu
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 20:56:04 Neil Walker wrote:
> On 09/03/10 15:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> I have kompozer-0.8_beta1 running on this box which is amd64 but
> >> quite a long list in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
> >
> > Well, as this box is ~amd64 I shouldn't need any of those. But
> >
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 20:56:04 Neil Walker wrote:
> I got an ebuild somewhere, probably bugzilla. If you want a copy,
> I've put it on http://www.neiljw.net/kompozer-0.8_beta1.ebuild.
Thanks Neil. I'll have a look at it in the morning. Or maybe the
afternoon, remembering some unfortunate inci
On 09/03/10 20:56, Neil Walker wrote:
> If you want a copy, I've put it on
> http://www.neiljw.net/kompozer-0.8_beta1.ebuild
>
Hehe. It seems a few people wanted that but I did see a couple of
http 404s in the logs. That's because you included the full stop.
Be lucky,
Neil
http://www.neiljw
On 09/03/10 15:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> I have kompozer-0.8_beta1 running on this box which is amd64 but
>> quite a long list in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
>>
> Well, as this box is ~amd64 I shouldn't need any of those. But kompozer
> isn't in portage as far as I can see, so how did y
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:05:03 Neil Walker wrote:
> I have kompozer-0.8_beta1 running on this box which is amd64 but
> quite a long list in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
Well, as this box is ~amd64 I shouldn't need any of those. But kompozer
isn't in portage as far as I can see, so how did y
On 09/03/10 12:14, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Has anyone here got kompozer to build on a Gentoo ~amd64 box?
I have kompozer-0.8_beta1 running on this box which is amd64 but
quite a long list in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
Be lucky,
Neil
http://www.neiljw.com/
Hello list,
Has anyone here got kompozer to build on a Gentoo ~amd64 box? I did have
a version running some months ago and I've tried to upgrade it but
failed. The compiled versions require old libs that aren't installed
here and the source needs some incantation I haven't found yet.
I use Blu
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:30:23 +0100
Zhang Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> |
> | Now I just switch back to Gentoo and discovered, well, I am not sure
> | but looks a bit lag behind on updating portage. I only noticed two
> | e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
|
| Now I just switch back to Gentoo and discovered, well, I am not sure
| but looks a bit lag behind on updating portage. I only noticed two
| examples:
| 2. The other package arphicfonts are not developed for years
|
Hello.
I was a Gentoo user some 2.5 years ago and was very fond of it because
it updates frequently and includes newer versions of applications into
portage faster than other distributions. Later I switched away to
Ubuntu for working environment reasons (colleagues are using Ubuntu and
I got sup
27 matches
Mail list logo
