Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2011, 00:13 +0100 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:36:32AM -0200, luis jure wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
i haven't used text browsers for some time now, but i definitely
prefered
links over lynx. if i were
on 2011-12-09 at 18:38 Pandu Poluan wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
i haven't used text browsers for some time now, but i definitely prefered
links over lynx. if i were you, i would try both. for me the links
interface was much better, although lynx seems to be
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:36:32AM -0200, luis jure wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
i haven't used text browsers for some time now, but i definitely prefered
links over lynx. if i were you, i would try both. for me the links
interface was much better,
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
At 2011-12-09 19:38:06,Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
I'm using lynx, I feel it is great ! Lynx is small but efficient, I think it is
totally enough for your demand, :-)
w3m,links and elinks. w3m and links as they support displaying images
under framebuffer, and elinks for it's javascript support.
If you don't need these features, any text browser is good for
browsing html documentation :)
On 9 December 2011 11:38, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
As the
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:44:50PM +, Penguin Lover Mariusz Ceier squawked:
w3m,links and elinks. w3m and links as they support displaying images
under framebuffer, and elinks for it's javascript support.
If you don't need these features, any text browser is good for
browsing html
On 9 December 2011 12:44, Mariusz Ceier mce...@gmail.com wrote:
w3m,links and elinks. w3m and links as they support displaying images
under framebuffer, and elinks for it's javascript support.
If you don't need these features, any text browser is good for
browsing html documentation :)
Not
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:40:01PM +0100, Lavender wrote:
At 2011-12-09 19:38:06,Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
I'm using lynx, I feel it is great ! Lynx is small but
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
In my experience, elinks has the best support for showing you
formatted, colorized, javascripted HTML in text
111209 Pandu Poluan wrote:
Which text browser do you recommend to read documentations in HTML.
Lynx : I've been using it daily since 1996 .
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []|
11 matches
Mail list logo