On Samstag, 11. August 2007, Grant wrote:
> > > > > The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
> > > > > systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
> > > > > and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you
> > > > > had some experience
> > > > The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
> > > > systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
> > > > and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had
> > > > some experience with it that would contradict my experiences.
> >
On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Grant wrote:
> > > The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
> > > systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
> > > and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had
> > > some experience with it that wo
> > The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
> > systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
> > and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had
> > some experience with it that would contradict my experiences.
> >
> > I always as
On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Zac wrote:
> The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
> systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
> and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had
> some experience with it that would contradict my
The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2
systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation,
and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had
some experience with it that would contradict my experiences.
I always assumed that the "If unsu
On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am Freitag 10 August 2007 16:57 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Zac wrote:
> > > Why don't you want mulit-core scheduler support?
> >
> > read the help text.
>
> CONFIG_SCHED_MC:
> Multi-core scheduler support impr
Am Freitag 10 August 2007 16:57 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Zac wrote:
> > Why don't you want mulit-core scheduler support?
>
> read the help text.
CONFIG_SCHED_MC:
Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision making when
dealing with multi-
On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Zac wrote:
> Why don't you want mulit-core scheduler support?
read the help text.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Why don't you want mulit-core scheduler support?
On 8/10/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Grant wrote:
> > I just upgraded from an AMD64 Sempron to an AMD64 Athlon X2. What do
> > I need to do in software to accommodate the new CPU? Do I need to
On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Grant wrote:
> I just upgraded from an AMD64 Sempron to an AMD64 Athlon X2. What do
> I need to do in software to accommodate the new CPU? Do I need to
> enable something in the kernel to get the dual cores working? I've
> read something about support for AMD's "Cool
I just upgraded from an AMD64 Sempron to an AMD64 Athlon X2. What do
I need to do in software to accommodate the new CPU? Do I need to
enable something in the kernel to get the dual cores working? I've
read something about support for AMD's "Cool and Quiet" technology
too.
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PR
12 matches
Mail list logo
