On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:26:23 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > It probably means you have run fix_libtool_files.sh, or possibly
> > lafilefixer, between installing and removing the package responsible
> > for that file. Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have
> > been subsequently modified
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:57:44PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
> It probably means you have run fix_libtool_files.sh, or possibly
> lafilefixer, between installing and removing the package responsible for
> that file. Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have been
> subsequently modified.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:10:41 +0200, Arttu V. wrote:
> > Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have been
> > subsequently modified.
>
> Just checking: anybody know how long has it been like this?
I've been using Gentoo since 2003 and AFAIK it's been like that all this
time.
--
Neil
On 3/12/10, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Emerge won't remove files it installed if they have been
> subsequently modified.
Just checking: anybody know how long has it been like this?
--
Arttu V.
On 3/12/10, Damian wrote:
>> Bummer. Are you sure your libarchive.la is not another orphan, just
>> like liblzmadec.la was?
> Indeed. libarchive.la is not owned by any package. Is this a symptom
> of a bigger problem?
Probably not, unless running Gentoo is considered a big problem. :)
You can r
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:23:51 +0100, Damian wrote:
> Indeed. libarchive.la is not owned by any package. Is this a symptom
> of a bigger problem?
It probably means you have run fix_libtool_files.sh, or possibly
lafilefixer, between installing and removing the package responsible for
that file. Eme
Hi Arttu,
>> Ok, so moving the file, reinstalling libarchive, and running
>> lafilefixer didn't change the situation.
>>
>> So I'm using gvfs without the archive flag.
>
> Bummer. Are you sure your libarchive.la is not another orphan, just
> like liblzmadec.la was?
Indeed. libarchive.la is not ow
On 3/12/10, Damian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Damian wrote:
>>> Anyway, if it were me I'd nuke the file in a heartbeat, but if OP is
>>> too timid for that, he can also quarantine the file first, i.e., move
>>> it to some other path where it won't cause trouble (and then delete
>>>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Damian wrote:
>> Anyway, if it were me I'd nuke the file in a heartbeat, but if OP is
>> too timid for that, he can also quarantine the file first, i.e., move
>> it to some other path where it won't cause trouble (and then delete
>> later). Also, (from the bug) his
> Anyway, if it were me I'd nuke the file in a heartbeat, but if OP is
> too timid for that, he can also quarantine the file first, i.e., move
> it to some other path where it won't cause trouble (and then delete
> later). Also, (from the bug) his libarchive.la seems to still list the
> .la, so he
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Arttu V. wrote:
> On 3/11/10, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> to determine whether this package provides it. I cannot do that as I
>> don't have lzma-utils on my systems anymore.
>
> Well, that can be sort of done with, e.g.:
>
> ebuild /usr/portage/app-arch/lzma-utils/lzma
On 3/11/10, Mark Knecht wrote:
> to determine whether this package provides it. I cannot do that as I
> don't have lzma-utils on my systems anymore.
Well, that can be sort of done with, e.g.:
ebuild /usr/portage/app-arch/lzma-utils/lzma-utils-4.32.7.ebuild install
It will run emerge phases unti
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Damian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Arttu V. wrote:
>> On 3/10/10, Damian wrote:
>>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>>>
>>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wo
Hi Mark,
> 1) What profile are you using? (eselect profile list)
default/linux/amd64/10.0
> 2) USE flags from make.conf
nls -kde -qt3 qt4 dvd alsa cdr X a52 aac acpi apm -arts \
bash-completion bzip2 crypt dbus dts dvdr ffmpeg flac gif hal hddtemp \
iconv jpeg jpeg2k latex libnotify lm_sen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Arttu V. wrote:
> On 3/10/10, Damian wrote:
>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>>
>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
>> somebody could give me a hint on how to s
On 3/10/10, Damian wrote:
> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>
> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem.
Are you still using lzma-utils, or ha
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Damian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Damian wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian wrote:
> While ago I reported a bug r
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Damian wrote:
> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>
> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem.
I don't use gvfs
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Damian wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian wrote:
While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Damian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian wrote:
>>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>>>
>>> It's been unresolved for quite a lo
Find out what package /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.so belongs to and re-emerge that
package.
If you have ccache activated, delete the whole cache before doing this.
If the problem is still present, at this point try
revdep-rebuild -i
HTH
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian wrote:
>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>>
>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
>> somebody could gi
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian wrote:
> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
>
> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem.
>
> Best,
> Damia
While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196
It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if
somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem.
Best,
Damian.
24 matches
Mail list logo
