Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-18 Thread Elias Probst
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 02:29:56 Grant wrote: I switched from The Wonder Shaper and started using shorewall configs and it's working great. I can't get ipp2p to identify bittorrent traffic though, so I have the default set up for really low priority. Thanks for your help! This is fun. -

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-18 Thread Grant
I switched from The Wonder Shaper and started using shorewall configs and it's working great. I can't get ipp2p to identify bittorrent traffic though, so I have the default set up for really low priority. Thanks for your help! This is fun. - Grant Never got Shorewall traffic shaping to

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-17 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:19:14 -0700 Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's actually my upload rate that's difficult to limit. That's not inbound traffic right? Right. You should be able to shape upload quite well. Did you try to lower allowed upload bandwith further below the nominate

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-17 Thread Grant
It's actually my upload rate that's difficult to limit. That's not inbound traffic right? Right. You should be able to shape upload quite well. Did you try to lower allowed upload bandwith further below the nominate bandwith? I switched from The Wonder Shaper and started using shorewall

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-16 Thread Grant
After a lot of testing, these numbers seem to give me the best performance as far as bittorrent download speed. How can that be? Is DOWNLINK my upload and UPLINK my download? Hm, usually not. Are you by chance shaping the internal (i.e. LAN) interface on a router? Then, of course, it would

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-16 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:00:04 -0700 Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After a lot of testing, these numbers seem to give me the best performance as far as bittorrent download speed. How can that be? Is DOWNLINK my upload and UPLINK my download? Hm, usually not. Are you by chance

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-16 Thread Grant
Well, the problem is that limiting inbound traffic is absolutely unreliable. From the numbers given, I guess you're on DSL, right? (Just like me, BTW.) If you were on cable, well, there's not a lot you can do since the media is unreliable w/ regard to your share of it. But I think you're talking

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-14 Thread Grant
Hello, I have packet shaping set up on my Gentoo router with iptables, shorewall, and The Wonder Shaper which is a /etc/shorewall/tcstart file. It seems to be working since internet radio is now full of hiccups. :) I never quite understood ingress shaping. Dropping packets always sounded

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-14 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:37:19 -0700 Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After a lot of testing, these numbers seem to give me the best performance as far as bittorrent download speed. How can that be? Is DOWNLINK my upload and UPLINK my download? Hm, usually not. Are you by chance shaping the

[gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-13 Thread Grant
Hello, I have packet shaping set up on my Gentoo router with iptables, shorewall, and The Wonder Shaper which is a /etc/shorewall/tcstart file. It seems to be working since internet radio is now full of hiccups. :) I'd like to configure it to prioritize voip, ssh, web browsing, bittorrent

Re: [gentoo-user] Packet Shaping

2007-04-13 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:24:03 -0700 Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have packet shaping set up on my Gentoo router with iptables, shorewall, and The Wonder Shaper which is a /etc/shorewall/tcstart file. It seems to be working since internet radio is now full of hiccups. :) I