On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:29:30 -0400
Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the words:
LDFLAGS typically come in the -llib and -Lpath variety and are used to
ensure that additional libraries and paths are included in the link
phase. You typically won't need to add these (which is probably why
If I replace
the pixie emerged by portage does that mess up anything as far as
portage is concerned?
Well, other than if an upgrade comes through emerge --update world would try
to overwrite what you install.
Otherwise portage will think it's in there.
I have one more dumb question. What
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:15:33 -0400
Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the words:
pixie: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libdpstk.so.0: undefined
symbol: DPSDefaultErrorProc
A google search for libdpstk indicates that this is a core library for
x11 with some references to it being
Hi Dave -- thanks for the response. I'm not sure I understand it all,
but I understand enough to get me started and do some testing. One
question however, when you say to build pixie manually, what do you mean
by building it manually? Is that different from
emerge pixie
Yeah.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:51:23 -0400
Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the words:
Hi Dave -- thanks for the response. I'm not sure I understand it
all, but I understand enough to get me started and do some testing.
One question however, when you say to build pixie manually, what do
Greetings;
When I try to run pixie I get the following result:
Wed Aug 31 06:23:19
~
skippi $ pixie
pixie: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libdpstk.so.0: undefined symbol:
DPSDefaultErrorProc
I tried to re-emerge pixie in order to see if that gave me any useful
error messages. It emerged quite
pixie: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libdpstk.so.0: undefined symbol:
DPSDefaultErrorProc
A google search for libdpstk indicates that this is a core library for x11
with some references to it being obsolete. I've got one for my xorg-x11
install, so it must not be too obsolete...
A google
7 matches
Mail list logo
