There is an option in the kernel that will make it see all the 4GB. Set
the option for up o 64GB in the kernel and you may use your 4GB.
On 1/24/08, Hal Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, but it won't last...
$ free
total used free shared
buffers
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
There is an option in the kernel that will make it see all the 4GB. Set
the option for up o 64GB in the kernel and you may use your 4GB.
and slow down memory access a lot.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
That's the problem. For one thing to work, you have to sacrify other(s). :-/
On 1/24/08, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
There is an option in the kernel that will make it see all the 4GB.
Set
the option for up o
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
That's the problem. For one thing to work, you have to sacrify other(s).
and AFAIR the option won't help you, if your maiboards bios maps pci-space at
the 3,6GB-4GB range.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
That's the problem. For one thing to work, you have to sacrify other(s).
and AFAIR the option won't help you, if your maiboards bios maps pci-space at
the 3,6GB-4GB range.
--
Well this machine supposedly supports up to 8GB of RAM so I can only
assume that it doesn't map the pci-space to there. But I wonder, will
enabling the higher RAM limit really open up more RAM? The BIOS detects
all 4096MB, but Grub only lists 3.6GB.
AFAIK your machine can only use as much RAM as
Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 schrieb ext Hal Martin:
AFAIK your machine can only use as much RAM as the bootloader detects,
no?
Would be a bad thing, wouldn't it?
No, the kernel does it's own detection.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
That's the problem. For one thing to work, you have to
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008, Ricardo Saffi Marques wrote:
That's the problem. For one thing to work, you have to sacrify other(s).
and AFAIR the option won't help you, if your
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:44:53 +0100
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Montag, 21. Januar 2008, Michael Higgins wrote:
So, I just got 2 GB of RAM in the mail. Whoo hoo.
Before I pop these in, soliciting any thoughts about the following:
zcat /proc/config.gz |grep MEM
Ahh, but it won't last...
$ free
total used free shared
buffers cached
Mem: 20598242044512 15312 0 37636 50868
-/+ buffers/cache: 1956008 103816
Swap: 428930812290243060284
Now this I can
So, I just got 2 GB of RAM in the mail. Whoo hoo.
Before I pop these in, soliciting any thoughts about the following:
zcat /proc/config.gz |grep MEM
CONFIG_SHMEM=y
# CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
On Montag, 21. Januar 2008, Michael Higgins wrote:
So, I just got 2 GB of RAM in the mail. Whoo hoo.
Before I pop these in, soliciting any thoughts about the following:
zcat /proc/config.gz |grep MEM
CONFIG_SHMEM=y
# CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
13 matches
Mail list logo
