[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine: post_src_unpack() { epatch_user } Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe to call epatch_user multiple times, so I support no breakages should be expected with

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread walt
On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine: post_src_unpack() { epatch_user } Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe to call epatch_user multiple

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote: On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine: post_src_unpack() { epatch_user } Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread Alex Schuster
Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote: On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I came across some ebuilds that result in: * QA Notice: command not found: * * /etc/portage/bashrc: line 3: epatch_user: command not found How do I solve

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/18/2011 11:50 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 09/18/2011 11:27 PM, walt wrote: On 09/18/2011 09:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I came across some ebuilds that result in: * QA Notice: command not found: * * /etc/portage/bashrc: line 3:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-18 Thread Alex Schuster
Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 09/18/2011 11:50 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: Do these ebuilds also need to apply the patches, or do you just want to get rid of the error message? It's just the error message. Which means this isn't an issue for now. It will become one if one of them will

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/12/2011 04:41 PM, justin wrote: On 9/12/11 3:21 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Some packages can apply patches from /etc/portage/patches/, other don't. Why don't all packages do that? Is there a way to make all packages use /etc/portage/patches? It a specific function which needs to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-12 Thread justin
A hacky trick would be to implement it yourself by adding the appropriate function to post_src_unpack of post_src_prepare in /etc/portage/bashrc. Nut this is out of warranty, but should work On 9/12/11 3:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 04:41 PM, justin wrote: On 9/12/11 3:21

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine: post_src_unpack() { epatch_user } Also, the epatch_user() docs mention that it's safe to call epatch_user multiple times, so I support no breakages should be expected with ebuilds and eclasses that call

[gentoo-user] Re: /etc/portage/patches/

2011-09-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/12/2011 05:42 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Thanks! A bashrc with the following in it seems to work here just fine: post_src_unpack() { epatch_user } In case anyone else is trying this, the above should be: post_src_unpack() { cd ${S} epatch_user }