Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs

2012-05-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:16:51 +0800 kwk...@hkbn.net wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:07 +0200 > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 > > walt wrote: > > > > > On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > > > I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs

2012-05-23 Thread kwkhui
On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:07 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 > walt wrote: > > > On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > > I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo > > > devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs

2012-05-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 walt wrote: > On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo > > devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales > > and reasoning behind changes that affect users. > > > > I'

[gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs

2012-05-23 Thread walt
On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo > devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales > and reasoning behind changes that affect users. > > I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do. > > T