On Wednesday 22 Feb 2017 21:07:59 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2017-02-22, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
> >
> >> I wasn't proposing that you could easily build 32-bit packages in a
> >> 64-bit root (though in theory I think you could). What I
On 2017-02-22, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
>
>> I wasn't proposing that you could easily build 32-bit packages in a
>> 64-bit root (though in theory I think you could). What I was
>> questioning was the assertion that you must reboot into 32-
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
> I wasn't proposing that you could easily build 32-bit packages in a
> 64-bit root (though in theory I think you could). What I was
> questioning was the assertion that you must reboot into 32-bit mode
> instead of just chrooting into
On 2017-02-21, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:50:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
>> On 2017-02-21, Mick wrote:
>
>> > You'll need to run in 32bit mode when chrooting of course:
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Is this some odd restriction in portage?
>>
>> All of the normal development tools
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:50:41PM +, Grant Edwards wrote
> On 2017-02-21, Mick wrote:
> > You'll need to run in 32bit mode when chrooting of course:
>
> Why?
>
> Is this some odd restriction in portage?
>
> All of the normal development tools are quite capable of buildign
> 32-bit binarie
On 2017-02-21, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 Feb 2017 00:22:51 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:34:47 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > Reading https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Binary_package_guide still leaves
>> >
>> > me uncertain. I have an ancient 32-bit Atom netbook. I've installed
6 matches
Mail list logo
