Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
The Ubuntu folks report on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh, that
bootup and also ./configure runs are *WAY* faster if dash is used
as /bin/sh instead of bash.
Did anyone try this out on Gentoo? Are the boot scripts from Gentoo
strictly
On 9/1/06, Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
little bash/python scripting involved... and none of the python bloat that
gentoo has going on in /etc/init.d.
AFACT, python is never invoked for any of the init scripts.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 04:06:15 +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
A 20% reduction in boot time is a reasonable impact IMO.
Any chance that was a fluke?
I ran the test several times, and switched back top bash to confirm. The
boot times were consistent, within the accuracy of the idiot holding the
On Saturday 02 September 2006 14:10, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 04:06:15 +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
A 20% reduction in boot time is a reasonable impact IMO.
Any chance that was a fluke?
I ran the test several times, and switched back top bash to confirm. The
boot times were
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:33:01 +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
You can force sux to use bash.
Just replace the first line in /usr/bin/sux with #!/bin/bash
That was the first thing I tried, it made no difference. A quick look at
sux shows it building a command to pas to exec that used $SHELL,. This is
On Friday 01 September 2006 17:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Speaking of which, you probably should see the shell used in the
scripts from the sys-apps/baselayout package. All shell scripts
use /bin/bash and not /bin/sh.
So linking (d)ash as the default shell doesn't nearly have the impact
On Friday 01 September 2006 22:06, Harm Geerts wrote:
On Friday 01 September 2006 17:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Speaking of which, you probably should see the shell used in the
scripts from the sys-apps/baselayout package. All shell scripts
use /bin/bash and not /bin/sh.
So linking
7 matches
Mail list logo
