Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Getting rid of gnome-vfs

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Fish
On 12/9/05, Edwin Kapauni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish wrote: [...] Equery depends is a little brain damaged here. It lists _possible_ dependancies, not real ones. Good to know. Is there any more reliable replacement for equery d? Nothing really simple, but you can script it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Getting rid of gnome-vfs

2005-12-09 Thread ellotheth rimmwen
gentoo-user is reading my mind... I just had the same firefox-thunderbird/gnome-vfs/equery depends question this morning, and was on the verge of make a list/forum post. I wonder if I bleed purple... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Getting rid of gnome-vfs

2005-12-08 Thread Edwin Kapauni
Holly Bostick wrote: And what are your USE flags for those packages? emerge -pv mozilla-firefox mozilla-thunderbird These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5 -canvas -debug *+gnome* -ipv6 +java

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Getting rid of gnome-vfs

2005-12-08 Thread Richard Fish
On 12/8/05, Edwin Kapauni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But equery says: ~#equery d gnome-vfs mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-1.0.7 www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5 Equery depends is a little brain damaged here. It lists _possible_ dependancies, not real ones. See if gnome-vfs show up in emerge

[gentoo-user] Re: Getting rid of gnome-vfs

2005-12-08 Thread Edwin Kapauni
Richard Fish wrote: [...] Equery depends is a little brain damaged here. It lists _possible_ dependancies, not real ones. Good to know. Is there any more reliable replacement for equery d? See if gnome-vfs show up in emerge --depclean --pretend. No, it didn't come up. But I could