On Sunday 02 March 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What supports what is a good reason for non-filesystem backups. For
example partimage has trouble with XFS (still...after all these
years...). A program like dd doesn't care the fs. Call it a device
backup if you like. This is your basic
Jonathan Haws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday March 2 2008 16:43, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Right - what you intend the backup to protect against drives all this
sort of stuff.
The thing that is driving my backups is a hard disk failure.
Of course :)
Hence I was
using Ghost instead of
What supports what is a good reason for non-filesystem backups. For
example partimage has trouble with XFS (still...after all these
years...). A program like dd doesn't care the fs. Call it a device
backup if you like. This is your basic choice in backup - device or fs.
Me personally,
3 matches
Mail list logo
