On 2008-03-03, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I don't understand why I have to do NAT. Can you explain why?
>> (Or point me to docs that explain why?)
>
> router01.your.network.com
> eth0 - 10.11.12.1
> eth1 - 24.1.2.231 - Comcast
> eth2 - 64.1.2.1
Grant Edwards wrote:
I don't understand why I have to do NAT. Can you explain why?
(Or point me to docs that explain why?)
router01.your.network.com
eth0 - 10.11.12.1
eth1 - 24.1.2.231 - Comcast
eth2 - 64.1.2.132 - Speakeasy
Naturally RFC 1918 space is useless outsid
On 2008-03-03, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-03, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm not aware of any iptables front end that will also manager
>> policy based routing which is Cisco-ese and maybe general
>> Network-ese for what you're trying to do. However I would u
On 2008-03-03, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not aware of any iptables front end that will also manager
> policy based routing which is Cisco-ese and maybe general
> Network-ese for what you're trying to do. However I would use
> shorewall (or whatever you prefer) to do most of the work
On 2008-03-03, Dan Cowsill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I found shorewall and firestarter, but neither looked very
>> useful to me:
>>
>> 1) [...] I'm not building a firewall machine.
> I hate to plug a non-gentoo distro, but if you're building
> yourself a linux firewall and you want to do
Grant Edwards wrote:
I found shorewall and firestarter, but neither looked very
useful to me:
1) They're both designed for configuring firewalls, and I'm
not building a firewall machine.
2) Neither seemed to have any way to specify port-based routing.
So it looks like plain iptables is t
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-03, Jason Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
> >> a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
> >>
> >> http://www.linuxhori
On 2008-03-03, Jason Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
>> a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
>>
>> http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
>>
>> However, it's using iptables, which I thought was deprecated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Grant Edwards wrote:
| AFAICT, iptables is the user-space portion of netfilter.
That's correct, yes.
- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman
Reliable inter-continental Mail Relay Service - Ask me!
Independent Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG
http://www.b
> On 2008-03-03, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
>>> a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
>>>
>>> http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
>>>
>>> Howeve
On 2008-03-03, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2008, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out how to do port-based routing. I found
>> a HOWTO that does pretty much exactly what I'm trying to do:
>>
>> http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html
>>
>> However, it's u
11 matches
Mail list logo
