Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-08 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 17:53:59 walt wrote: On 02/07/2012 09:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com mailto:w41...@gmail.com wrote: Now that Pandu has mentioned it, I can edit the google-chrome ebuild to do what I want :) The part where I install the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:18 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday 07 Feb 2012 17:53:59 walt wrote: On 02/07/2012 09:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com mailto:w41...@gmail.com wrote: Now that Pandu has mentioned it, I can edit

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-08 Thread walt
On 02/08/2012 01:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:18 + Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Must you use Chrome? What's wrong with Chromium? Chrome is a binary blob Chromium is built from source There used to be a chromium-bin a while ago but the maintainer got

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:47:01 -0800 walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/08/2012 01:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:18 + Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Must you use Chrome? What's wrong with Chromium? Chrome is a binary blob Chromium is built from

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-08 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 08 Feb 2012 22:47:01 walt wrote: On 02/08/2012 01:47 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:18 + Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Must you use Chrome? What's wrong with Chromium? Chrome is a binary blob Chromium is built from source There used

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote: On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild was removed a while ago, I'm guessing

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On 02/07/2012 08:57 AM, walt wrote: However, the newer google-chrome package forces the downgrade of libpng to libpng12 for the entire machine Damn, fooled again by the ebuild message after installing libpng12 :( The post-install message announces that I now need to run revdep-rebuild to fix

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote: On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On 02/07/2012 09:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com mailto:w41...@gmail.com wrote: Now that Pandu has mentioned it, I can edit the google-chrome ebuild to do what I want :) The part where I install the obsolete libpng12 in the /opt/google/chrome