Am 16.11.2011 17:00, schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
>>> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100
>>> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
>> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100
>> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K.
>
> Yep. So Intel noticed "wow, we get a few of
Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
> Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
>> overclock
>
> No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed.
But as far as I read reviews online it is easy and rather safe
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to overclock
No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed.
>
> Did you also consider the newer i7-2700k? Maybe too expensive because
> it's so new. And I assume it's not that much f
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:00:15 +0200, masterprometheus wrote:
>
>> For AMD I'd recommend to go for a 960T :
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103995
>> It's a 95W and as a Zosma it's actually a 6-core. Most of those (not
>> all unfortunately) can be
5 matches
Mail list logo