On 5 Jan 2010, at 06:21, Mick wrote:
...
Solved. The problem was CFQ I/O scheduler. It was several times slower
than the others, for whatever reason.
...
Hmmm ... reading at the help files I thought that CFQ was the default/best
option for a desktop. Is there such a thing as a best fit
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:15:00 Stroller wrote:
On 5 Jan 2010, at 06:21, Mick wrote:
...
Solved. The problem was CFQ I/O scheduler. It was several times slower
than the others, for whatever reason.
...
Hmmm ... reading at the help files I thought that CFQ was the
default/best
2010/1/5 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:15:00 Stroller wrote:
On 5 Jan 2010, at 06:21, Mick wrote:
...
Solved. The problem was CFQ I/O scheduler. It was several times slower
than the others, for whatever reason.
...
Hmmm ... reading at the help
And what about the BFS scheduler? I know, that it isn't in the
mainline kernel, bit I've heard a lot of good about that.
If you send me the size and the number of the test files, I'll make an
other benchmark with the CFQ, the Deadline and the BFS scheduler on a
Dual Core machine. :-)
--
Szénási
On 5 Jan 2010, at 11:39, Mick wrote:
What does experience show to be a best option for a desktop that has:
a) Single CPU?
b) Dual core?
c) Quad core?
On 5 Jan 2010, at 12:38, Szénási István wrote:
And what about the BFS scheduler? I know, that it isn't in the
mainline kernel, bit I've
2010/1/5 Szénási István sze...@gmail.com
And what about the BFS scheduler? I know, that it isn't in the
mainline kernel, bit I've heard a lot of good about that.
If you send me the size and the number of the test files, I'll make an
other benchmark with the CFQ, the Deadline and the BFS
BFS is a CPU scheduler, CFQ, Deadline, No-Op, and Anticipatory are all I/O
schedulers...
Sorry, I've realized that when I googled for benchmarks and it was
compiled against the CFS scheduler. :-)
--
Szénási István
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I got a Nokia N900 linux internet tablet/phone a few days ago, and
when I connect it in USB Mass Storage mode to a Windows Vista computer
I can write at 17MB/sec, but when I connect it to my Gentoo box my
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 05:26:32 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I got a Nokia N900 linux internet tablet/phone a few days ago, and
when I connect it in USB Mass Storage mode to a Windows Vista computer
I
9 matches
Mail list logo
