Konstantinos Agouros [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
Hi,
will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_pre
for 2.6.19.
Regards,
Konstantin
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel.
-Original Message-
From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm
tree. You
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel. Have a look at
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info..
But there's no unionfs-utils unless you're using sabayon overlay...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.
What exactly is it, and what does it do?
(:P Besides the statement that it is an FS.)
Let's ask our friend: http://www.google.com/search?q=unionfs
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html
Great for livecds (among other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
-Original Message-
From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use
-Original Message-
From: Ali Polatel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:46 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
snip
I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS
6 matches
Mail list logo
