Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-10 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Harry Putnam wrote: > Just to close this thread... a reboot swept away all `ls' problems so > still not sure what caused it, but am happily having normal experience > with `ls' once again. Might well be that the reboot caused an fsck run, which fixed the problems. cu --

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-05 Thread Alex Schuster
Indexer writes: > Another thing to check, is that the folder is marked +x in chmod. > It may be that on reboot some automated cleaning script re-added > that flag. > > Folders can only be listed if they are +x btw Right, but Harry would have gotten a permission denied error in this case, not a h

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-05 Thread Indexer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Another thing to check, is that the folder is marked +x in chmod. It may be that on reboot some automated cleaning script re-added that flag. Folders can only be listed if they are +x btw On 06/11/2010, at 01:37, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2010-11-0

[gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-05 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-11-05, Harry Putnam wrote: > Alex Schuster writes: > >> Am 01.11.2010 11:28, schrieb Harry Putnam: >> >>> I can view the directory with emacs in dired mode but `ls' simply will >>> not complete... never shows anything and stays hung indefinitely. >> [...] >>> It only seem to happen on $HO

[gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-05 Thread Harry Putnam
Alex Schuster writes: > Am 01.11.2010 11:28, schrieb Harry Putnam: > >> I can view the directory with emacs in dired mode but `ls' simply will >> not complete... never shows anything and stays hung indefinitely. > [...] >> It only seem to happen on $HOME how very odd. >> Anyone else seen that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread covici
Harry Putnam wrote: > Alan McKinnon writes: > > > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:28 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry > > Putnam > > did opine thusly: > > > >> Something I have not run into before. > >> > >> Following a major update still in progress I find the ls command will > >> not r

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:30 on Monday 01 November 2010, alex did opine thusly: > > I suspect directory corruption in /home - is it a separate partition? > > > > I don't recall if you mentioned this or not, do you get the same result > > if you run "ls $HOME" as root? root's home dir is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 01.11.2010 14:13, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > Apparently, though unproven, at 14:51 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry > Putnam > did opine thusly: > >> Alan McKinnon writes: >> >> >> [...] >> > What shell are you using? > What is the output

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:51 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon writes: > > > [...] > > >> > What shell are you using? > >> > What is the output of "echo $HOME"? > >> > >> My shell is xterm... and was just updated to: > >> Wed Oct 27 10:15:0

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:51:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > However, as indicated earlier... my user or root can run `ls' against > any other directory like normal. > > ls /etc > > Shows the content of /etc > > ls /home/reader What about ls /home/reader/somedir ? -- Neil Bothwick A frien

[gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: [...] >> > >> > What shell are you using? >> > What is the output of "echo $HOME"? >> >> My shell is xterm... and was just updated to: >> Wed Oct 27 10:15:06 2010 >>> x11-terms/xterm-262 > > That's the terminal. > > What shell do you use/ > Sorry... still asleep... ba

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Willie Wong
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:07:34PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > >> Something I have not run into before. > > >> > > >> Following a major update still in progress I find the ls command will > > >> not run on $HOME. > > >> > > > By the time the command hits ls itself, the shell has already expan

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:56 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon writes: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:28 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry > > Putnam > > > > did opine thusly: > >> Something I have not run into before. > >> > >> Followi

[gentoo-user] Re: When ls command fails but only on $HOME

2010-11-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: > Apparently, though unproven, at 12:28 on Monday 01 November 2010, Harry > Putnam > did opine thusly: > >> Something I have not run into before. >> >> Following a major update still in progress I find the ls command will >> not run on $HOME. >> >> I can view the directo