On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:17:17 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > I've not checked lately, but policy was that if an ebuild change did
> > not result in differences in the installed files, there was no need
> > for a version bump. This avoids needless recompiling of packages.
> >
>
>
On 8/5/19 3:21 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 09:59:06 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> I see, I got caught (again) by the favorite gentoo sleight of hand of
>> updating a package and not bumping its version. In my case, eudev.
>
> I've not checked lately, but policy was that if
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 09:59:06 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> I see, I got caught (again) by the favorite gentoo sleight of hand of
> updating a package and not bumping its version. In my case, eudev.
I've not checked lately, but policy was that if an ebuild change did not
result in differences in
On 2019-08-03 18:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> It seems odd that portage would want to install packages that weren't
> a dependency of something else. They are here, for example
>
> % emerge -cpv acct-group/kvm
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> acct-group/kvm-0 pulled in by:
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
