Apparently, though unproven, at 04:07 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Keith Dart
did opine thusly:
> === On Wed, 02/09, Dale wrote: ===
>
> > Now some of you know how much I hate windows. Of course, DOS wasn't
> > much better,
>
> ===
>
> Yep. I've been using Linux on my desktop since version 1
=== On Wed, 02/09, Dale wrote: ===
> Now some of you know how much I hate windows. Of course, DOS wasn't
> much better,
===
Yep. I've been using Linux on my desktop since version 1.2, and
UnixWare before that. Some Mac in there too. I avoid Windows like the
plague that it is.
-- Keith Dart
--
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p
What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :)
Yeah, come to think of it, wh
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:05 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
> > Or maybe Alan, if he's done polishing his humility plugin :p
>
> What make you think he's got one... or even know what it is :)
Yeah, come to think of it, what is that thing anyway? Must be
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:59 -0800, walt wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
> >> krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test n
On 02/09/2011 02:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
versions of such "far reaching" stuff as glibc on a single mac
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:39:15 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> > That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others.
> > Fortunately, nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I
> > recompiled glibc.
>
> Same here, but are you saying you fixed this by rebuilding 2.13? I ask
>
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:47:01 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:16:20 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> don't use prelink - but postfix still Works For Me(tm)
>
> That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others. Fortunately,
> nothing was lost, it just stayed in
8 matches
Mail list logo