On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:55:23 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> ebuild /usr/local/portage/app-text/pdftk/pdftk-.ebuild manifest
> /usr/local/portage/app-text/pdftk/pdftk-.ebuild: line 1: syntax
> error near unexpected token
> `newline'
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:55:23 -0600
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 03/15/2018 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Did you try the non-gcj ebuild for pdftk?
I would like to try it.
On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>>>From my earler posting:
>>
>>http://repo.or.cz/marcv-overlay.git/tree/HEAD:/app-text/pdftk
>>
>> NB: I haven't tried it, and have know idea if it works.
>
> How do you tell portage about this ebuild?
On 03/15/2018 10:49 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>>> Did you try the non-gcj ebuild for pdftk?
>>
>> I would like to try it.
>> Where did you find it?
>
>>From my earler posting:
On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Did you try the non-gcj ebuild for pdftk?
>
> I would like to try it.
> Where did you find it?
>From my earler posting:
On 03/15/2018 08:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> That is not what I (we) need.
>> pdfunite - will join several PDF file into one (this is not what I want).
>>
>> I need to "overlap" two PDF file, one on top of another, it is
On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> That is not what I (we) need.
> pdfunite - will join several PDF file into one (this is not what I want).
>
> I need to "overlap" two PDF file, one on top of another, it is like
> watermarking. I only do it once a year when
On 2018-03-14, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>>
>> I'm assuming that was meant as a
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
>
> I'm assuming that was meant as a question?
It was phrased as a question, so yes, it was a question.
On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk".
I'm assuming that was meant as a question?
A few seconds with Google came up with these:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-text/qpdf
10 matches
Mail list logo